By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to a Truth Social post by Donald Trump, California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized Trump for seemingly forgetting he was president on January 6, 2021, and repeating debunked claims about the Capitol Riots being a Democratic hoax. Newsom’s remarks highlighted Trump’s post where he demanded action while incorrectly stating the “Biden FBI” placed agents at the scene. This marks the second time in recent weeks Trump has made this false claim, prompting concerns regarding his mental state and recent gaffes. Trump, who has been scrutinized since assuming the presidency for the second time, has been seen attacking his opponent for cognitive decline on the campaign trail.
Read the original article here
Newsom Trolls Trump, 79, for Forgetting Defining Moment of His First Presidency | It seems to have slipped the president’s mind who exactly was the commander-in-chief on Jan. 6.
The core of the discussion centers on California Governor Gavin Newsom’s recent “trolling” of Donald Trump, specifically in response to Trump’s apparent forgetfulness regarding his role on January 6th. It’s quite the spectacle, isn’t it? The idea that a former president, a man who held the highest office in the land, could seemingly forget the events of that day is, to put it mildly, eyebrow-raising. The comments highlight the perception that Trump’s forgetfulness isn’t just about a lapse in memory; it’s potentially a strategic move, a calculated way to shape a narrative. This is the consensus, the sentiment that resonates throughout the dialogue.
The comments also suggest that Trump’s base is more interested in believing what he says, regardless of its factual accuracy. The argument is that Trump knows his followers will accept whatever he puts forward, even if it contradicts established facts. This is amplified by references to past events, like the belief among some of his supporters that Obama was president during 9/11. The overarching idea is that the truth isn’t a priority, but rather that Trump is crafting a reality for his followers.
The conversation further explores the implications of this alleged forgetfulness and the surrounding political maneuverings. The comments acknowledge that Trump’s actions are not always a result of forgetting. In fact, a lot of this may be a play, a part for his supporters to absorb. This suggests that his statements are intended to rile up his base, further polarizing the political landscape. The idea of Trump as a senile figure, manipulated or manipulating others, comes into play.
The discussion also delves into the broader implications of Trump’s actions and the impact they have on the political arena. There’s a general consensus that Trump’s base is unwavering in their support, no matter what he says or does. This points towards a deeper problem: a population immune to factual information and operating more on emotion and loyalty than reasoned judgment. The core of the discussion is whether these events are just the beginning of an even more tumultuous period.
There’s also the consideration of blame-shifting and scapegoating. The comments mention that Trump might deflect responsibility by blaming others, such as Pence or Biden, or even the FBI. The subtext is that Trump has always taken the route of avoidance, refusing responsibility, or trying to take credit, depending on the outcome. The focus here becomes about the actions of Trump and how he might be perceived.
The comments reflect on the narrative being constructed around Trump’s actions. It’s presented as a numbers game where Trump has the advantage of his supporters. The tone often shifts towards a sense of amusement and even a bit of morbid curiosity, watching the spectacle unfold. The core of the discussion seems to center on the entertainment value of Trump’s statements, while simultaneously acknowledging the potential dangers of his actions and the support that is given.
The idea that Trump doesn’t care about the truth, but instead wants to create a specific narrative for his followers, which is another point frequently brought up. The comments suggest he is not trying to hide a truth. He’s more interested in destroying the concept of truth itself. This ties back to the previous point about Trump’s influence and how it affects his core supporters, who may not differentiate between what’s factual and what’s not.
The thread’s final comments pivot to the media’s role, specifically the clickbait headlines that exploit the situation. The comments highlight how these headlines are designed to elicit a reaction, to capture attention rather than provide meaningful information. This suggests that the media is partly responsible for amplifying the drama, playing into the existing polarization, and potentially profiting from the spectacle. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle, and this seems to be the ultimate takeaway.