By John Q. Hosedrinker 
NATO has authorized the supply of Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, significantly increasing its long-range strike capabilities, which could strike targets up to 1,500 kilometers away. While initial shipments are expected to be limited, the deployment of these missiles would allow Ukraine to target Russian military assets deep inside Russian territory. Russia has strongly warned of “serious consequences,” but NATO anticipates only rhetorical responses, not direct military action. Deployment faces challenges, including the need for specialized launch platforms and integration with existing Ukrainian systems, though this could also serve as a bargaining chip for further diplomatic talks.
Read the original article here
NATO Approves Tomahawk Missile Supply To Ukraine, Dismisses Russian Threat, sounds like the kind of headline that could turn heads, doesn’t it? Well, it would be pretty significant if it were true. Confirmation from reliable sources is key here. But if it pans out, it’s definitely something Ukraine could use right now.
Now, a critical point to consider is that the decision ultimately rests with the United States. While NATO may give a nod, it’s the US that controls the spigot. We’re talking about the potential for some serious escalation here, the sort that might lead to some “cigarette fires” far behind the front lines. The anticipation alone suggests a shift, a possible strengthening of resolve. Frozen Russian assets being used to fund the war by some EU countries is a significant change, marking a pivot in the strategy of the conflict.
And, of course, the US gets to determine the terms of engagement: how, when, and if these missiles are deployed at all. This sets the stage. Imagine the impact this would have. It’s safe to assume that certain figures in Russia might be having a moment, if the story is true. And it speaks volumes about the type of weaponry we’re talking about – a subsonic, two-ton cruise missile that flies incredibly close to the ground, at a mere 100 feet.
This is a formidable weapon, incredibly difficult to intercept. The sheer prospect of it, especially in the hands of Ukraine, could dramatically alter the landscape of the conflict. However, a major question mark is how these missiles would be launched. Tomahawks are typically fired from naval assets. So, the question of how Ukraine would employ them is a crucial one.
Inevitably, we also have to consider the reactions it will prompt. You’d have to expect a sharp response from Russia, perhaps involving the kind of rhetoric we’ve unfortunately become accustomed to. We are talking about the Kerch bridge and various Russian targets, which would be the likely targets in Ukraine. But the real game-changer is what could happen if Ukraine is allowed to use these new weapons with no restrictions.
Of course, there is always the fear of extreme retaliation. The concern about the possibility of Putin resorting to nuclear weapons is something that can’t be dismissed lightly. These are the kinds of fears that understandably linger in the back of people’s minds. It is always a risk that cannot be taken off the table.
In the midst of this, we need to be discerning about what we’re reading. Is this a solid, credible report? It is worth noting the oddity of a news story about NATO’s decisions appearing in an unconventional source. It’s essential to look for that confirmation from a trustworthy source.
Here’s another key issue. The decision doesn’t solely rest with NATO or even the US as a whole. It will require the approval of former President Trump. That is a major variable. The US has played a key role in the war already, providing intel on Ukrainian strikes and giving advance warning of incoming attacks.
The ongoing support from the US underscores how vital it has been for Ukraine. If the US hadn’t been providing this level of assistance, the situation could be dramatically different. One thing to recognize is the complex nature of this conflict. This mirrors the drawn-out nature of the US involvement in the Middle East.
Ultimately, the consensus seems to be that Russia won’t resort to nuclear weapons, but will certainly use them as a threat. The hope, of course, is that Ukraine’s allies will continue to provide help, in the form of these missiles and other weaponry, to hasten the end of the conflict. The US also knows the location of most of the refineries. The destinations are known, the topography and locations of air defenses are more unknown.