By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Cuomo’s continued presence in the political arena, despite his past controversies and loss in the Democratic primary, highlights the influence of financial backing in politics. Forced to resign from the governorship in 2021 amid allegations of sexual harassment, Cuomo still receives significant financial support from conservative donors. His opponents, like Curtis Sliwa, have used his history to question his electability. Sliwa’s statement during the debate stage highlights Cuomo’s lack of support within his own party and his difficulty in accepting rejection.
Read the original article here
Mike Johnson Apparently Knows Nothing That’s Going On, at least that’s the general consensus. It’s almost as if it’s become a defining characteristic, a strategic move, or perhaps a convenient truth. The overwhelming sentiment is that he’s either genuinely clueless or deliberately feigning ignorance, and the latter seems far more likely. The core of the issue lies in the constant dodging of questions, the standard “I don’t know” response that seems to have become the go-to answer, rather than offering any actual insight or information. It leaves one wondering why journalists continue to accept this, why they don’t press harder, and why the “I don’t know” strategy is considered acceptable.
This apparent lack of awareness extends to fundamental aspects of the country’s operation. It’s not just about specific details, but the bigger picture: the ongoing political battles, the needs of the people, and the consequences of policy decisions. The general impression is that he’s more focused on other priorities, such as defending a certain former president, than being informed about the issues he’s tasked with addressing.
The role of the media in this is heavily questioned. The frustration is palpable when news outlets let him off the hook, failing to push for answers or hold him accountable. The public seems to know more than he does. There’s a call for sharper questions, for a demand that he justify his position given his apparent lack of awareness. If his job is to represent the people, shouldn’t he be aware of the daily struggle of the people?
His constant use of “I don’t know” suggests either incompetence or a conscious choice to avoid transparency. If he doesn’t know what’s going on, how can he be effective in his role? Shouldn’t the leader of the House of Representatives be informed, engaged, and able to address the critical issues facing the nation? It is as though he is following a script, a calculated strategy, where ignorance becomes a defense mechanism. He seems to deflect responsibility, and avoid difficult conversations.
The hypocrisy is another point of contention. While claiming ignorance on critical matters, he seemingly knows a great deal about other things, such as the former president’s perceived greatness, or issues that are relevant to his specific political agenda. This selective awareness fuels the perception that he is not acting in good faith. His allegiance appears to be elsewhere, his focus diverted.
The comments also reflect a deep disappointment in the political process. It’s as though this behavior is yet another instance of a tired, old tactic, a cynical game. The public wants leadership, accountability, and honesty, but instead, they’re met with evasion and ignorance. The question of whether he cares, and whether his actions are motivated by self-interest, looms large.
And it’s clear that the public sees him as such. A puppet, more interested in maintaining the status quo and pleasing those in power than in serving the interests of the people. This perceived lack of leadership, his reliance on blind denial, and his failure to take responsibility all feed into the image of a leader who is either incompetent or deliberately disengaged.
The expectation is that journalists would challenge these statements, dig deeper, and hold him accountable. The frustration stems from the feeling that the media is not doing its job, that it is failing to demand answers and transparency. The people need to know, they deserve to know, and the silence allows for continued wrongdoing.
It’s worth noting that the issue goes beyond mere incompetence. It reflects a deeper concern about the political system itself. The ability to “know nothing” and still hold a position of power, speaks to a broken process. The system seems to reward sycophancy and blind allegiance.
The conclusion is clear: Mike Johnson apparently knows nothing that’s going on, and the public is paying the price. The repeated use of the phrase reflects this sentiment, and underscores the frustration with his perceived lack of awareness and accountability. The question now is whether the public will continue to accept this and for how long.