By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has threatened legal action against House Speaker Mike Johnson for failing to swear in Adelita Grijalva, who won a special election to represent Arizona’s 7th Congressional District. Grijalva’s swearing-in is crucial because she could be the deciding vote to force a vote on releasing files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Mayes believes Johnson’s delay is politically motivated, potentially due to Grijalva’s support for the Epstein files release and has accused Johnson of depriving Arizona of its full representation in Congress. If Johnson does not provide a timeline for Grijalva’s swearing in, Mayes plans to seek judicial relief, arguing that his actions are unconstitutional.
Read the original article here
Mike Johnson Hit With Legal Threat in Epstein Vote Drama | Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes believes that the only reason Adelita Grijalva has not been sworn in is to stop the release of the Epstein files. That’s the crux of it, plain and simple.
It seems pretty straightforward, doesn’t it? If a legitimately elected representative isn’t allowed to represent their constituents, you sue. That’s the bedrock of our system, and it seems like Arizona’s Attorney General, Kris Mayes, is doing just that. The argument is that the delay in swearing in Adelita Grijalva is purely a tactic to prevent the release of those Epstein files. You can see the logic; it’s almost too obvious.
The situation is becoming increasingly frustrating. There’s a strong feeling that this is a national disgrace. It’s getting tedious, watching this play out. It’s clear as day that Johnson is terrified of the Epstein vote. The assumption is that the budget issues are simply being used as a smokescreen to stall and negotiate for votes against the release. It’s tough to see the motivation of a certain portion of the voting bloc when their principles seem to bend to racism and bigotry.
But let’s be realistic, it looks more and more like the budget is their hill to die on. The underlying idea is to protect certain figures who may be implicated. It really makes you wonder. Could Mike Johnson himself be implicated? The silence is deafening, and the delay in swearing in Grijalva just adds to the suspicion. The solution, the thinking goes, is to move beyond mere threats of legal action and actually begin the legal process.
The fundamental issue is that Grijalva won the election, and she deserves to be sworn in. The fact that the Speaker of the House can simply choose to prevent that from happening is, frankly, mind-boggling. Some are questioning why legal action hasn’t begun sooner. It’s almost too obvious, from the outside, but it raises the question, is this about protecting certain individuals who may be implicated in the Epstein case?
The Republicans are likely to do whatever they can to prevent this vote from happening. There is a sense of urgency, with the implication that there may be attempts to seal documents to make any vote irrelevant. But there’s also the question of why the Arizona AG is just threatening legal action at this point. The feeling is that the swearing-in process is a formality, the real commitment to the oath of office is the signed document. What’s holding things up? Maybe they’re waiting for something, like the release of Virginia Giuffre’s book, to take some of the heat off the situation.
It’s clear that the prevailing sentiment is that the Republicans will never release the Epstein files. Threats are pointless; what’s needed is action. The feeling is that the Epstein issue is much larger than just Trump; that the “business model” is still alive and well, functioning in the shadows. The belief is that Johnson is hiding something, and that his motives are suspect.