By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Steve Bannon, former White House chief strategist, predicted that Donald Trump will run for and win a third term as president in 2028, according to an interview with *The Economist*. Bannon, host of the “War Room” podcast, suggested that despite the 22nd Amendment, which limits presidents to two terms, there are “many different alternatives” to achieve Trump’s goal. He considers Trump an “instrument of divine will” and believes America needs him to finish what was started. A recent poll showed that while 50% of Americans believe Trump will attempt to run, a larger majority, 69%, do not think he should.
Read the original article here
Trump is ‘gonna be president’ in 2028, and it’s certainly stirred up a hornet’s nest of reactions. The blunt declaration of a “plan” by a prominent figure has, as expected, ignited a flurry of speculation, concern, and, frankly, disbelief. Let’s break down the core sentiment here.
The assertion that Trump will be president in 2028 seems to be met with a spectrum of responses, ranging from outright dismissal to a chilling sense of inevitability. Many individuals seem to question his physical and mental capacity to even run, let alone win, by that point. The general consensus is that his advanced age and current health struggles make it highly improbable. The idea of him being in a care facility by then is mentioned, indicating a widely held belief that he may not even be capable of participating. The stark reality check comes from the observation that he will be 82 years old by the time the election rolls around.
However, the comment about “a plan” adds a layer of complexity. This immediately raises concerns about the potential for undermining democratic processes. There’s a palpable fear that the rules of the game may be disregarded or manipulated to secure a third term, even if, realistically, Trump’s health would not be enough. The use of phrases like “topple the regime” and suggestions of secession by “blue states” underscore the gravity of the situation and the depth of the division. The notion of running an “AI avatar” in his place is a darkly humorous, but potentially unsettling, concept that would highlight the cynicism some might attribute to the party.
The reactions also reveal a profound distrust of the motivations and actions of those aligned with Trump. The accusations of cult-like behavior and comparisons to authoritarian regimes demonstrate the level of animosity some people feel, and also reflect the fear that this situation is being presented as an inevitable outcome. The mention of “the insurrection act” and the intention to “invoke” it suggests that there is a deep fear of the abuse of power.
The discussion also dives into the potential legal and political repercussions of such a move. The idea of Democrats running someone like Obama to challenge any potential unconstitutional actions further emphasizes the high stakes and the willingness to fight back if necessary. The focus on “third term” and “toppling the regime” points at a deep-seated concern that the Constitution may be disregarded.
Underlying these reactions is also a sense of frustration and disillusionment with the American electorate. The criticism of “fucking idiots” and the reference to a lack of civic engagement are sharp, reflecting the feeling that a significant portion of the population is either uninterested in politics or easily misled. The comments about an “idiotic population” highlight the belief that the stability of a democracy hinges on an informed and engaged citizenry. The quote about the Athenians sending slaves to drag people to political debates shows that in order for a democracy to survive, the populace must be informed and take responsibility.
Ultimately, the responses to the claim of Trump’s return in 2028 are a reflection of a deeply polarized nation, a country grappling with fundamental questions about its future.