By John Q. Hosedrinker 
AP News: In Madagascar, President Andry Rajoelina was ousted following weeks of youth-led protests sparked by issues such as poverty and power outages. After Parliament voted to impeach Rajoelina, who fled the country, the military announced its intention to form a council and appoint a prime minister. The military suspended the constitution, and a referendum is expected to take place in two years. Despite Rajoelina’s attempts to dissolve parliament, lawmakers moved forward with the impeachment, leading to the current political upheaval.
Read the original article here
Madagascar’s president is ousted in a military coup after weeks of youth-led protests, a story that quickly grabs your attention. It’s the kind of headline that immediately sparks curiosity, isn’t it? We’re talking about a country, an island nation off the coast of Africa, that might be best known to some for a certain animated movie about talking animals. But behind the familiar imagery, real-world events are unfolding, and they’re taking a dramatic turn. The most immediate takeaway is that the president, the one who was running the show, is no longer in charge.
This seismic shift in power, the ousting of the president, didn’t happen overnight. It was the culmination of weeks of youth-led protests. Think about that for a moment. It’s the young people of Madagascar who were on the front lines, voicing their discontent, making their voices heard. It’s a powerful statement when a generation feels compelled to take to the streets, isn’t it? The protests, in this case, clearly proved impactful.
Now, we have Colonel Michael Randrianirina stepping into the picture. In front of the ceremonial presidential palace in Antananarivo, the capital city, he made a very clear declaration. He announced, “We are taking power.” Soldiers and celebrating protesters formed the backdrop to his words, amplifying the momentous nature of the situation. He mentioned that the constitution and the powers of the High Constitutional Court have been suspended, which fundamentally alters the legal framework of the nation. He added that a referendum is planned in two years, without providing any specifics.
This two-year timeframe for a referendum is intriguing. Is it a promise of change? A signal that stability is being sought? Or is it simply a way to manage the transition of power? Time will tell, of course, but it’s a pivotal piece of information to consider. It also prompts the question of what kind of elections will be held, how they will be organized, and most importantly, will they reflect the will of the people or will be another way of solidifying power?
The geopolitical implications of a coup like this can be wide-ranging and complex. Who stands to benefit from this change? Major players on the world stage, like Russia, China, the US, Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia/UAE could all potentially find themselves in altered positions, as do most global powers. And it is worth considering how the existing power structures, especially those that are not local, could become more prevalent. Conversely, France, where the ousted leader has reportedly sought refuge, may have a vested interest in the outcome, but might not stand to benefit from the situation. This adds yet another layer of intricacy, bringing up questions about alliances and strategic influence.
Speaking of the ousted leader, we now know that he has mysteriously relocated to an undisclosed location. He tried to dissolve the parliament/senate and now, the military has effectively seized control of the state’s communication channels, including television and radio stations. The details are still emerging, but the implications are evident: This is a complete restructuring of the Madagascan power structure.
You have to wonder about the state of the Madagascan economy, and what role that played in these events. The state of their economy is likely a significant factor. A struggling economy can be fertile ground for discontent, creating the conditions where people are more willing to take risks and seek change. It highlights the interconnection between political stability, economic prosperity, and the basic needs of the population.
Interestingly, the now-ousted president rose to prominence by leading the youth into protests against a corrupt government. Then, he took power after a previous coup. A somewhat familiar pattern emerges, doesn’t it? Protests, a change in leadership, and the promise of a better future. And now, Gen Z is in the driving seat. One thing that’s for sure, this is not the first time this has happened.
It makes you wonder, will this time be any different? It’s easy to feel cynical. The expression “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss” comes to mind. But the fact that Gen Z is at the forefront this time is noteworthy. It suggests a fresh perspective, different priorities, and perhaps a different kind of leadership. But also a very different kind of pressure and challenge as well. What the youth of Madagascar hope for is that their efforts ultimately lead to a more just and prosperous future for their nation.