By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Wednesday, Kendra Sullivan, a West Virginian, was surprised to find that her solo “No Kings” protest had gone viral. At a follow-up YouTube meeting organized by the coalition behind the national demonstrations, Appalachian activist Ash-Lee Woodard Henderson highlighted Sullivan’s demonstration in Beckley, which involved holding signs and facing confrontations from locals. Sullivan, who felt lonely on Saturday, decided to protest in her hometown after she realized there were no other nearby events. Despite facing negative reactions, including police involvement, Sullivan stood her ground, expressing the importance of showing her face and representing her views in her community.
Read the original article here
The lone woman who staged a ‘No Kings’ protest in rural West Virginia – what an incredibly powerful image, isn’t it? It immediately speaks of dedication, the kind that demands you stand your ground even when you’re the only one doing so. It highlights a bravery that’s often overlooked, the courage to be an island in a sea of opinions, especially in a community where speaking out might mean going against the grain. Considering West Virginia’s economic realities, where many are juggling multiple jobs just to make ends meet, the act becomes even more significant. It’s not just about disagreeing; it’s about making a stand despite the very real challenges of daily life, like affording basic necessities.
To clarify, while the focus is on a single, strong individual, the reality is that the “No Kings” sentiment resonated with a wider audience. There weren’t just a handful of protests, but sixteen separate events across the state, which adds a layer of depth to the narrative. The woman in Beckley, even though she might have been the sole protestor in her immediate surroundings, was part of something bigger, something that was echoing throughout the state. It also brings up the geographical and social makeup of the location. Beckley isn’t exactly what most people would picture as “rural”. It’s a town with its own identity, a hub in its own right, and it deserves some consideration in how it fits in a conversation about what makes up a “place”.
It’s natural to feel a sense of respect, maybe even a touch of sadness, when you consider the sheer vulnerability of being out there alone. The fact that the sign she held echoed the sentiments of others just adds to the sense of solidarity. And, to be clear, it’s not a commentary on any single individual, but on the simple idea of standing up, with no one else standing there with you. It’s a testament to the power of individual action. It’s like Rosa Parks on the bus. That’s a powerful example, because solitary protests, like that one, have the power to create a ripple effect.
Interestingly, this individual’s actions, and the events that followed, have generated a diverse reaction, with even some counter-protests. The act of standing alone often draws attention and, at times, can elicit direct responses from others. The very act of taking a stand can be a catalyst for further conversation and action. And it’s a reminder that even in the face of confrontation, or the possibility of confrontation, the commitment to freedom of speech remains paramount.
Some might view her actions as exceptionally courageous; others could interpret the reactions. One consideration is the different forms of courage, especially when weighed against the actions of those with opposing views. Are these different acts of courage of equal measure? One thing to consider is how much easier or harder it is to express your views if you are surrounded by people who feel the same.
There’s also a more philosophical aspect to unpack here. The definition of courage itself. Is courage simply “doing something scary,” or does it have a deeper, more nuanced meaning? Perhaps courage is tied to noble causes, actions that align with some greater good. Can there be courage that is not inherently “good?” It’s a thought-provoking debate. The emotional weight the word “courage” carries needs examination. Does it automatically bestow a level of respect to those who exhibit it? Or should “courage” be reserved only for those who are steadfast in support of values that society deems to be good? It’s a point worth pondering when discussing individual action and societal values.