By John Q. Hosedrinker 
New York Attorney General Letitia James responded to her indictment by the U.S. Attorney’s office of the Eastern District of Virginia, calling the charges politically motivated and part of the president’s attempts to weaponize the justice system. James stated the charges are baseless and a direct result of her office’s ongoing litigation against the Trump Organization. James asserted her office would vigorously fight the charges and remain committed to protecting New Yorkers and their rights.
Read the original article here
Attorney General Letitia James addressed the escalating concerns surrounding the alleged weaponization of the Department of Justice, framing it as a direct continuation of a troubling pattern. Her statement strongly condemns what she views as the president’s attempts to leverage federal law enforcement for personal and political gain, specifically in response to her office’s investigation. She doesn’t mince words, describing the charges as “baseless” and directly tied to her actions as the New York State Attorney General.
Her perspective highlights the potential for significant damage to the established order. She suggests that the president’s actions, including the removal of a United States Attorney who resisted politically motivated charges, are a grave threat to the bedrock principles of American justice. James views this as a blatant attempt to undermine the integrity of the legal system, with loyalty to the president taking precedence over adherence to the law.
This statement strongly supports the integrity of her office’s ongoing legal actions against the Trump Organization, which, she emphasizes, are based on facts and evidence uncovered during a comprehensive two-year investigation. Judges have already supported her case. She underscores her unwavering faith as a source of strength, declaring her resolve to confront these challenges with courage. Her commitment is firm: her office will continue to vigorously defend New Yorkers and their rights, and she vows to continue fulfilling her duties.
The core of the response directly addresses the accusations by highlighting her investigations. She firmly establishes the basis for her actions, presenting them as rooted in legal principles and evidence, not political agendas. Her commitment to her work as an elected official is clear.
Her assessment seems to be that such actions by the president warrant condemnation from both sides of the political spectrum. The response implies a call to action for leaders to actively counter this apparent abuse of power. The clear implication is that the integrity of the judicial system is at stake, and all leaders should rise to the defense of justice.
In the face of criticism, James appears resolute. Her statement is more than just a legal defense. It is also a declaration of her commitment to the legal system. It underscores the importance of upholding the law and defending the rights of all citizens.