By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Early Friday, Russia launched a large-scale missile and drone attack on Ukraine, targeting energy infrastructure and residential areas. The assault resulted in casualties, including a child, and widespread power outages affecting over half of Kyiv, along with water supply issues. At least ten energy facilities were hit, prompting emergency crews to work to restore power, as emergency blackouts were implemented in the Kyiv region. Residential buildings in Kyiv also sustained damage from drone strikes, causing fires in a high-rise apartment block.
Read the original article here
Much of Kyiv Without Power as Russia Targets Civilians, a grim reality unfolds with each passing day. The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure, including power grids, has plunged large swathes of the Ukrainian capital into darkness. This isn’t a side effect of war; it’s a calculated tactic, a strategy designed to break the spirit of the people. The aim is clear: to disrupt daily life, to sow fear and despair, and to erode the will to resist. This, tragically, is the nature of modern warfare – a brutal and indiscriminate assault on the innocent.
The echoes of historical parallels resonate through this conflict. The decision to target civilians, as Hitler did in England, is a grave one. It signifies a shift towards a more savage approach, one that disregards the basic principles of human decency. The aim isn’t just military victory; it’s about breaking the will of the people and forcing surrender through suffering. It’s a strategy that has been employed throughout history, and one that, sadly, continues to be used today.
The stories emerging from Kyiv are heartbreaking. Ordinary people, going about their lives, are now facing the daily struggle for survival in the face of a sustained attack. Friends of mine who used to enjoy gaming together are now caught in the crossfire, while I, sitting here in India, feel utterly helpless. It’s a stark reminder of the human cost of this war – the loss of life, the displacement, the disruption of families and communities. The use of missiles on civilian targets is not just reprehensible; it’s a war crime.
The situation is complex and the narratives presented by various media outlets should be carefully considered. It’s important to understand that the war doesn’t operate on headlines alone. Both sides are targeting both civilian and military targets, each with their own strategic goals. To add to the complexity of the situation, Ukrainian actions, such as attacks on Russian territory, are met with mixed reactions, highlighting a double standard in how the conflict is perceived and judged.
The tools available to the world to fight the war are also a source of debate. Military hardware, such as Tomahawk missiles, are a subject of discussion and criticism. The use of missiles, regardless of the target, is often criticized due to the potential of escalation. The deployment of certain weaponry could lead to further retaliation and an escalation of the conflict.
The destruction of energy infrastructure has become a key feature of the conflict. Blackouts are devastating, especially during the cold months. This tactic has a far-reaching impact, crippling essential services, disrupting daily life, and adding to the suffering of the civilian population. Many people have already left the country to avoid the ongoing conflict.
The reaction to Ukraine defending itself is important. The concept of one side having the right to attack energy infrastructure and another not, speaks volumes. Such double standards only prolong the conflict, and undermine any hopes for a peaceful resolution.
The impact of the war extends beyond the immediate conflict zone. The economic and social consequences are being felt across the globe, with rising energy prices, supply chain disruptions, and increased geopolitical tensions. This is a war that affects everyone, whether they realize it or not.
The arguments about alliances and global politics are complex and often emotional. The position of India and its government is distinct, but it’s important to remember that individual opinions shouldn’t be reduced to simplistic categorizations.
Ultimately, the aim is to defend those under threat, and uphold the values of freedom and self-determination. The response to these attacks has to go beyond mere condemnation and must involve concrete actions to protect civilians, hold perpetrators accountable, and support Ukraine’s right to defend itself.