By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vice President JD Vance has been vocal about his belief that certain individuals, particularly people of color, are insufficiently grateful for the opportunities America provides. This criticism has been directed towards figures like Kamala Harris, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Joy Reid. Vance’s comments have drawn criticism, with some suggesting they play into harmful stereotypes of “ungrateful” minorities. Experts suggest that Vance’s focus on gratitude taps into broader anxieties among some white Americans about demographic shifts and the perceived loss of their dominant position in society.
Read the original article here
JD Vance Keeps Demanding Certain People Show ‘Gratitude’ — And We Bet You Know What They Have In Common, and it’s starting to feel like a pattern. It seems there’s a recurring theme in his rhetoric, a persistent call for “gratitude,” and it’s often directed at a specific group. The question isn’t just why he’s asking for it, but who exactly he’s demanding it from, and what underlying message that conveys.
The crux of the issue appears to revolve around a sense of entitlement, a belief that certain people are inherently deserving of thanks simply for existing under a particular rule or system. The notion that women should be grateful for the right to vote, or that anyone should be grateful for the basic tenets of civil rights, feels particularly jarring. It’s like saying, “You should be thankful I allow you to breathe.” The power dynamic inherent in such statements is hard to ignore.
This constant demand for gratitude can be interpreted as a veiled threat, a way of establishing control and solidifying a hierarchical structure. It implies that those who don’t express the “appropriate” level of gratitude are somehow the “enemy.” It’s a tactic often employed by those seeking to consolidate power, using gratitude as a tool to enforce fealty and silence dissent.
The comments suggest that the people Vance targets with his demands often share something significant in common: they are those who are not part of his perceived in-group. This may extend to those who are not white, or not aligned with his political ideology, or not willing to accept his version of how the world should be. He is demanding that people show gratitude for things they didn’t receive from him, but from broader societal movements or just their own inherent right to exist.
It’s easy to understand why this sentiment is so widely condemned. It feels like a manipulation, especially considering the position of power he and those aligned with him hold. The consistent demand for gratitude from those who have, in many cases, faced historical and ongoing marginalization, is deeply insensitive. It’s a reflection of his own deeply entrenched ideas and views and his lack of self awareness.
The comments draw a comparison to abusive relationships, highlighting the parallels between Vance’s behavior and the tactics of a domestic abuser. This suggests a pattern of control, a desire to dictate how others should feel and behave. The concept of “Look what you made me do” energy is something many find familiar, highlighting the insidious nature of this behavior.
The comments express a strong sense of disgust and disdain. People don’t just disagree with Vance; they seem to find his behavior repellent. This is because Vance appears to be out of touch, and he fails to understand the reality that people exist in. His comments come across as dismissive and even contemptuous of those who hold differing views or have different experiences.
Many wonder where these people come from and are bewildered that these individuals are running the country. It leaves many in disbelief that these are the people in power. The call for an end to the current state of affairs is a common thread, a desire for a return to the rule of law and a rejection of the entitlement that many perceive.
The use of the term “weaponized gratitude” is particularly insightful. It captures the way in which the demand for gratitude is used as a tool of control, as a means of silencing dissent and reinforcing a particular worldview. It’s a clear example of the way in which language and social dynamics can be manipulated to serve a political agenda.
Overall, JD Vance’s persistent demands for gratitude are perceived as a cynical tactic, a reflection of a desire for power and control, and a lack of empathy. The common thread among those he targets appears to be their position outside his perceived in-group, making his demands all the more suspect and concerning.