By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The US has escalated its involvement in Venezuela, conducting lethal strikes on alleged cartel boats and authorizing covert CIA operations, possibly to remove President Maduro. This has fueled speculation about potential military action, including strikes on land, targeting either drug operations or the regime itself. While the administration has prioritized removing Maduro, it’s unclear if the US will pursue a full-scale intervention, although it’s clear the US is continuing a long-held policy of removing Maduro. These actions, framed through the lens of combating drugs and migration, are drawing concerns over the legality and potential consequences of regime change. The situation remains uncertain, with a range of possible outcomes from continued strikes to more direct intervention.
Read the original article here
So, is the US about to attack Venezuela? Well, let’s break this down. The initial thought here, and it’s a strong one, is that the US is *already* attacking Venezuela. Forget the “about to” part; the action has begun. We’re talking about things like bombing boats, which, let’s be honest, feels like an act of aggression in any other scenario. And that’s before we even start to think about the economic and political pressures that have been brought to bear.
The driving force behind this seems to be a familiar one: resources. Specifically, oil. Venezuela sits on the largest proven oil reserves in the world, and that’s a significant factor. It’s hard to ignore the potential for “imperialist” tendencies, especially when we consider who’s been at the helm in the past. It’s no secret that the US has an eye on those reserves. The mention of Trump’s administration and its interests in Venezuelan oil is pretty clear.
The current situation is quite delicate, both politically and economically. And let’s be frank, it feels like this is all a distraction. There’s a lot going on behind the scenes that someone might want to draw attention away from, like economic woes, government shutdowns, and those infamous Epstein files. You can practically hear the media machine spinning up to divert attention.
Then there’s the narrative. The White House has declared some groups in Venezuela “foreign terror organizations,” essentially painting the current government as leaders of narco-gangs. They’ve also released videos of them bombing so-called drug boats, claiming they killed terrorists. It’s a classic move: manufacture a reason for action. But the credibility of these videos? Well, that’s up for debate. But in their world, they are at war.
Here’s where it gets really complicated: the legalities. Any declaration of war would need congressional approval, but that might not matter. This could all be framed within the “War on Terror,” possibly bypassing Congress altogether. And if they *do* take action, it might even be challenged in the Supreme Court. The President, though, has the power to simply ignore the court and the legal basis for it all gets pretty shaky.
Now, let’s look at the political landscape. Anti-war sentiment is strong across the political spectrum. The public isn’t exactly clamoring for more military intervention, especially after the experiences of the past few decades. But a “War Time President” can sometimes get a boost in popularity. And that’s a political advantage.
And let’s be honest, it’s not like the US hasn’t done this before. The US has a history of involvement in regime changes across Latin America, and in the case of Venezuela, the motivations are abundantly clear.
The conclusion here is that the US probably is already involved and the potential for a full-blown attack is very real. There’s the distraction aspect, the resource grab, and the political motivations all converging. It’s a complex situation with a lot of moving parts and it appears the US is already well on its way.