By John Q. Hosedrinker 
To meet its hiring goals, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been allowing recruits with incomplete background checks into its training program. Sources revealed that some recruits dismissed during the hiring surge had failed drug tests, possessed criminal histories, or didn’t meet physical or academic standards, despite the agency’s assertion that the vast majority of new hires are experienced law enforcement officers. Internal data indicates that over 200 recruits have been dismissed since the summer hiring surge. While the Department of Homeland Security disputes the accuracy of these figures, this development raises concerns about potential compromises in vetting processes.
Read the original article here
ICE Barbie’s DHS Trained Criminals to Be Agents: The revelations surrounding ICE hiring practices are deeply concerning, painting a picture of an agency seemingly designed for abuse and lacking in basic standards of professionalism. The discovery that individuals with criminal records, including those involving strong-arm robbery and domestic violence, were hired without proper background checks, including the submission of fingerprints and drug tests, raises serious questions about the agency’s intentions and the vetting process. The fact that this was happening, and some within the agency were not submitting fingerprints, suggests a blatant disregard for established procedures and an alarming willingness to lower standards.
It appears the administration was actively stacking ICE with individuals who could be described as “MAGA maniacs,” equipping them with weapons, and sending them into cities, hidden and masked, to carry out a political agenda. The motivation, it seems, goes beyond mere enforcement of laws; it suggests a desire to intimidate and suppress dissent, building a private army and using them to impose a particular political will. This is a very disturbing trend.
The lack of robust background checks, coupled with the hiring of individuals with violent criminal histories, indicates a blatant disregard for law enforcement standards. The implication is that these agents are being selected not for their adherence to the law, but for their willingness to break it. The perception is that ICE is operating as an unchecked paramilitary force, using tactics that are more aligned with a totalitarian regime than a democratic one. This is because they are literally trained to do so. The administration’s embrace of individuals with violent tendencies as ICE agents seems to be a deliberate act, a conscious decision to create an agency that operates outside the bounds of the law, with little regard for justice or human rights.
The decision to hire criminals is not just about incompetence or lack of oversight; it is a clear indication of the administration’s values. In this environment, decent and law-abiding individuals are not welcome. In fact, decent individuals are completely unable to be an agent. Only those willing to compromise their morals and engage in questionable, even illegal, activities are given the opportunity. This is a direct assault on the rule of law.
This whole process is about causing fear and intimidation. The goal is to silence dissent and crush any opposition. The consequences of this approach are devastating for both immigrants and the broader community. The use of fear tactics and the blatant disregard for the law undermine the very foundations of American democracy, creating an environment where basic human rights are at risk.
The fact that the administration seemingly relaxed its requirements for ICE officers, further suggests that the agency’s integrity is compromised, and the agency is operating under a different set of rules. The failure to adequately vet candidates and the hiring of individuals with a history of violent behavior suggest a complete lack of accountability.
In the end, hiring criminals to be agents is about creating a force that will do the administration’s bidding, no matter the cost. It is about power, control, and a total disregard for the principles of justice and fairness. The hope is that there can be some way of holding these individuals accountable for their actions, to see them brought to justice for their crimes.