By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The upcoming “No Kings” protests, scheduled for Saturday, October 18th, are projected to surpass the scale of previous demonstrations against Donald Trump. These events, focused on opposing overreach and protecting democracy, are being meticulously planned and organized. Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin provided insights into the preparations. The expectation is that these events will draw significant participation.
Read the original article here
Historic turnout is expected for nationwide “No Kings” protests against Trump overreach. This time, the stakes feel higher, and the anticipation is palpable. The call to action has resonated, and a wave of citizens is preparing to make their voices heard.
The last “No Kings” day was a first-time experience for many, including some who’d never participated in a protest before. The sight of families, with kids in tow, making signs and joining the movement, was a powerful symbol of the widespread concern. And now, with another protest on the horizon, there’s a sense that this time, things will be different.
The opposition is already gearing up. The use of labels like “Hate America” by political figures reveals a pre-emptive strategy to discredit the event. This is a signal that the movement is seen as a threat and that those in power are preparing to combat it.
The core message remains clear: a rejection of any form of monarchy or unchecked authority. The idea of Trump possibly exploiting the “ANTIFA” narrative to crack down on protestors underscores the importance of a massive turnout. The more people who participate, the harder it is to dismiss the movement.
This isn’t just about marching with signs, however. The history of social movements shows that disruptive, yet peaceful actions are often necessary to truly influence change. Sit-ins, boycotts, and mass demonstrations that challenge the status quo, whether they are against institutions or commerce, can create real momentum.
There’s frustration brewing with what some view as performative activism. Symbolic gestures, while important, may not be enough to create the shifts needed. Some feel that the protests need to evolve, to be more impactful.
The logistical details are starting to emerge, with people checking local protest locations and preparing to join the movement. The desire to be heard, to add one’s voice to the chorus of dissent, is a driving force. The focus is on action and making sure people who feel this way, put their feelings into action.
The sentiment is that those who feel wronged by current policies and have the power to vote and stay home, should be the first to speak up. This is viewed as an opportunity to rectify the situation.
There’s a recognition that simply hosting occasional protests might not be enough. Sustained effort and disruptive tactics, as seen in the Civil Rights movement, are needed.
The fear is that a false narrative of events will be created. The labeling of protestors, and the coverage from media outlets, may be biased.
The need for vigilance is emphasized. The threat of government overreach is real. It’s important to stand with friends, but not alone. The message is to be prepared and aware.
There’s a concern about the financial support for these protests. The question is, who is funding these events, and what are their motivations?
Many still believe in peaceful protest. However, there’s also a recognition that merely “sending a message” may not be enough. There’s skepticism toward those that don’t have clear, actionable goals.
Some fear that the protests could be manipulated, or ignored. The concern is that without clear goals and sustained pressure, the movement might lose its momentum. The feeling is that the impact will be minimal without a strategic plan to effect real change.
The overall frustration points towards the fact that these actions may not have real impact. The call is to get to work and to change the system through voting.
There are fears of backlash, and a feeling of being unsafe at these events. The right is viewed as likely to incite conflict.
There is a general query as to the previous result of the last protest. While the number of people who turned out was high, it’s a question as to what tangible results were achieved.
The suggestion is to take action and to challenge Trump’s own image. Some hope that this will lead to an uprising. The idea is to satirize and challenge. The goal is to flip the script, and to get ICE and the media to take action against the image of Trump.
It is hoped that by co-opting MAGA attire and protesting in Trump’s image, it will undermine the administration’s own messaging. The point is that this can change the way that the country moves forward.
There’s the feeling that the turnout will not be “historic.” The protest’s message may not be felt and Trump’s actions won’t change.
Even with the game on, the protest will go on. The point is to take action even if things are not perfect.