By John Q. Hosedrinker Following a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, gunmen were present at the funeral of Marwan Issa, a high-ranking Hamas military commander. Issa was killed in an Israeli airstrike during the recent conflict, his death marking a significant loss for the group. The funeral took place in the central Gaza Strip, where the presence of armed individuals underscored the ongoing tensions despite the declared truce. The somber event served as a display of solidarity and a reminder of the volatile situation in the region.
Read the original article here
Hamas carries out wave of Gaza killings, casting doubt on disarmament demand – this is the reality we’re facing, and it’s a grim one. Since the beginning of the most recent ceasefire, we’re hearing reports of at least 32 people killed by Hamas within Gaza. Think about that for a moment: in the wake of a supposed pause in hostilities, a new wave of violence is unleashed, not by the IDF, but by the very group that controls the territory. It’s a situation that understandably casts a long shadow over any discussions of disarmament, or of creating a peaceful environment for the people of Gaza.
The implications are pretty stark. This isn’t just about a few isolated incidents; it’s a pattern. The question naturally arises: How can anyone seriously consider the possibility of a lasting peace, or expect Hamas to disarm, when they’re actively carrying out killings? We have to be real, such actions utterly erode any trust and severely damage the prospects for stability. I mean, it seems pretty clear that Hamas is resistant to the idea of giving up their arms, doesn’t it? The recent killings, while a tragedy, don’t change anything in the eyes of Hamas, and this should not be ignored.
Consider the victims. It’s incredibly difficult to grasp the context behind these killings, but it’s important to try and remember that the victims are people too, living in an already volatile environment. Reports suggest they might be perceived “gang members,” or perhaps perceived opponents of Hamas, or even individuals suspected of collaborating with Israel. It’s very difficult to say what the situation truly is, but each death represents a loss of life in a place where life is already incredibly difficult. And with the ceasefire in place, it is easy to see how the world will quickly move on, turning its gaze away from the suffering within Gaza.
This raises the uncomfortable question: Where is the outrage? When we see these kinds of actions, particularly in the context of calls for peace, we have to wonder why there isn’t more widespread condemnation. We’ve witnessed protests, and heard declarations about the need for Palestinian self-determination. Is this the kind of self-determination people had in mind? Do we care less when the violence comes from within the Palestinian community itself?
I feel for the people of Gaza, truly I do. Imagine living under a constant threat of violence, of starvation, and of destruction. Imagine the psychological toll of knowing that you could be killed by any side. It’s truly unimaginable to me. But it would seem Hamas doesn’t give a damn about the people they “lead”. And as long as Hamas is in power, the people of Gaza will continue to live under threat.
And again, let’s talk about the political side of this. Disarmament is always difficult, but here, the context makes it even more complicated. And the reality of the situation isn’t a new development. The pattern of internal conflict and violence predate any Western interference in the region. Let’s not be naive and think it hasn’t always been this way.
Of course, some might try to justify Hamas’s actions by pointing to the actions of others, but it is impossible to excuse violence. How can you have any sort of peace while Hamas continues to murder their own people?
It’s a sad reality, this conflict has, in some ways, become a lucrative business for those farming content, and unfortunately, any atrocities that arise in Gaza would be used to get attention, no matter who the victim is.
We also can’t ignore the geopolitical realities that shape this situation. The influence of various global players, and voting blocks, is certainly at play. It’s easy to see how such dynamics can skew public discourse and, regrettably, make objective conversations about the situation incredibly hard to come by. In the long run, nothing is likely to change, but the people of Gaza will continue to suffer. And it’s a sad commentary on the state of the world.