By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Hamas has announced the recall of 7,000 security forces to “cleanse Gaza,” raising concerns of civil conflict as Israeli troops withdraw following a peace deal. Experts suggest that the power vacuum created by the war and the IDF’s departure, coupled with widespread arms, could spark internal fighting among Palestinian factions. Hamas claims to be “imposing order” while refusing to disarm as stipulated in the peace agreement, and tensions have been rising between Hamas and other powerful groups. Recent clashes have already resulted in casualties, indicating the potential for escalating violence in the war-torn region.
Read the original article here
Hamas deploys 7,000 troops to ‘cleanse Gaza’ as Palestinians scramble to fill power vacuum: ‘Perfect recipe for civil war’ is a pretty stark reality check, isn’t it? It sounds like the situation is incredibly volatile and could easily spiral into something much worse. It’s understandable that questions arise regarding the presence of so many fighters. How can they still have 7,000 troops, especially after everything that’s happened? Where did they come from, and what are they planning?
This move by Hamas, especially after the ceasefire, raises eyebrows. We see the rapid transition from civilian clothes back into something more resembling a military force. This behavior does beg the question of what Hamas is planning, what their end game is, and whether it involves continuing their actions in the region.
Of course, it’s no surprise that the current state of affairs fuels concerns about a potential civil war within Gaza. The power vacuum left behind by the recent conflict creates the perfect opportunity for internal factions to vie for control. When we see this kind of power struggle, it’s hard to imagine anything but a bloody outcome.
The core issue, as some believe, is that a lasting peace can’t be achieved unless the people of Palestine refuse to tolerate Hamas. There is a sentiment that a solution might begin with holding the Oct 7th attackers accountable. This could have possibly prevented the need for the military intervention. It’s easy to feel that an international peacekeeping force might be necessary to keep a check on Hamas. However, it’s also easy to predict that the situation will soon be blamed on outside parties.
The underlying motivation driving Hamas, according to some, goes beyond mere territorial disputes. It is presented that their core aim is the complete eradication of Jews. This is a grim perspective that, if true, makes any kind of negotiation or compromise almost impossible. It puts the focus on the deep-seated religious and ideological differences, which seem very difficult to bridge.
Adding fuel to the fire, there are direct quotes from Hamas charter, further solidifying this viewpoint and the extremist views held by its members. It seems to highlight the religious basis of the conflict. The refusal to return hostages, as agreed, is a violation of the peace terms, it gives credence to concerns about Hamas’s true intentions. Some raise the question of whether Palestinian supporters in the West would ever openly condemn Hamas’s actions against its own people.
It’s also important to note the level of support Hamas enjoys within Gaza. It’s a difficult subject, but some believe the vast majority of Gazans support them. This level of support adds another layer of complexity to the problem. With a population of over 2 million people, it’s not so difficult to find 7,000 individuals willing to participate in Hamas’s operations, whether out of conviction or desperation. It’s believed that Hamas has controlled Gaza since 2006, they have instilled this ideology over the decades.
The idea that Hamas’s fighters are simply “humanitarian aid workers with guns” is a deeply cynical viewpoint. It’s also mentioned that Hamas uses civilians as human shields, a tactic that, if accurate, would make any military response that much more difficult and morally complex.
Another question is, why are Hamas troops seen as a “gang of criminals”? The perception that Hamas is not a conventional military force but a criminal organization is a way of looking at their motives and actions. It calls into question the true objectives of the organization. Some have a strong suspicion that the current situation is some form of political game being played out.
There’s also the practical question of how Hamas still has weapons and ammunition after the level of destruction in Gaza. It’s worth considering the effects of the conflict and the circumstances of the people in Gaza. For many young men, joining Hamas or similar organizations is a choice made out of desperation, as they have little to no other options. In this context, it’s easy to see how military action might inadvertently fuel the cycle of violence and extremism.
The overall assessment is that the situation is incredibly complicated and is filled with danger. It’s a mess of ideological differences, historical grievances, and basic human desperation. The prospect of a civil war looks like the most likely outcome, and it highlights the urgent need for a viable solution.