Two years after the October 7th attacks, Hamas released a statement commemorating the event, referring to it as a “glorious day.” The statement was accompanied by an AI-generated video featuring Yahya Sinwar and footage from the attacks. This celebration underscores Hamas’s continued validation of the violence. The attacks involved Palestinians crossing the border fence from Khan Yunis into Israel.

Read the original article here

Hamas celebrates two years since October 7, calling the terror attack a ‘glorious day’ – it’s a stark reality. It’s a jarring concept to process: an organization, which is Hamas, openly celebrating an act of terror that unleashed unimaginable suffering. This isn’t just a matter of disagreeing on political strategies; it’s a fundamental clash of values, a world where the killing, rape, and kidnapping of civilians are not only tolerated but are, unbelievably, considered “glorious.” The implications are chilling.

For Hamas, this “glorious day” represents a perceived victory, a vindication of their tactics. The fact that they could look at the destruction and loss of life and see something to celebrate is difficult to grasp. The mindset behind this is truly baffling, and it further complicates the potential for any sort of peaceful resolution. It underscores a profound disregard for human life, not just of their enemies but also, tragically, their own people.

The fact that there are supporters who echo this sentiment, shown by the demonstrations and rallies, is equally disturbing. One can only imagine how it must feel to be a civilian, living under the shadow of this ongoing conflict, to know that such actions are being celebrated, to be reminded of this “glorious day” every day.

It seems the attack has only reinforced the cycle of violence. The idea that Hamas would repeat these actions if given the chance is a terrifying prospect. Their actions show a complete lack of concern for the consequences, for the lives lost, and for the future they are supposedly fighting for.

This celebration also casts a dark shadow over any attempts at negotiation or peacemaking. How can you negotiate with an organization that considers atrocities a victory? This attitude hardens any potential for compromise. It signals a deep-seated unwillingness to find common ground or acknowledge the suffering of others.

One must consider the impact on Gazan civilians, who, according to information, had a majority support for Hamas before the conflict, who now live under the continuous threat of war and destruction. It makes one wonder if these individuals can also be considered part of this “glorious day” as well. It points to a serious problem within this society.

The West has a right to be disgusted by this show of support for Hamas, who in their eyes are terrorists, as the article expresses. If this was turned around, where Israel was celebrating their attacks, the public would have the right to be outraged at this event.

It’s tempting to despair when faced with such a blatant disregard for human life, for the possibility of peace, and for the fundamental values that underpin civil society. It’s a reminder of the complexities and the enduring pain that plague this region.