By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to an internal government memo reported by Der Spiegel, a drone swarm deliberately surveyed critical infrastructure in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, including a power plant and naval facility. This incident adds to growing concerns about airspace violations by Russia, which has been accused of similar incursions by several NATO members like Denmark, Estonia, Poland, and Romania. The confirmed drone sightings, coinciding with investigations into drone disruptions in Denmark, have prompted heightened security measures and raised questions about the effectiveness of existing air defense systems. Authorities are investigating the incidents as potential acts of sabotage or espionage, while experts express concern about the insufficient protection of Germany’s critical infrastructure.
Read the original article here
New mystery drone swarm in Germany, critical sites targeted: Report, and it’s got everyone talking. The immediate reaction, and honestly, it’s hard to disagree, is: “Shoot them down!” If these unidentified aerial objects are trespassing, potentially gathering intelligence, or even posing a direct threat, then a firm response seems warranted. The fact that these “drones” are reportedly targeting critical sites, well, that just ratchets up the urgency.
It’s interesting how the term “drone” itself sparks so much debate. What exactly are we talking about here? A small, off-the-shelf quadcopter, or something more sophisticated, potentially even military-grade? The lack of clarity on the type and size is frustrating. The reports mentioning the RAF typhoons near the UK and the Denmark incident the day after adds another layer of questions. It’s essential to be precise when describing these things. One can only assume the drone size isn’t a small, personal, remote controlled device.
The frustration is palpable, and the calls for action are loud and clear: intercept, identify, validate, accuse, and retaliate. There’s a sense that these “mystery” objects shouldn’t be a mystery for long. Some suggest using the same anti-drone technology deployed in Ukraine, whatever that might be. I’d also point out that the implication is that if Poland can identify and take down Russian drones, why can’t others?
There is a deep-seated sense that the governments need to be more transparent. One of the many concerns expressed, which is understandable, is that this is a dry run for something bigger. That this is a test of defenses, exposing vulnerabilities, and potentially pushing countries to invest in countermeasures that could divert resources away from supporting Ukraine. The suspicion is, in essence, an attempt to weaken the countries from the outside. The question now is: is this a coordinated effort? Are we just seeing a few isolated incidents, or is this a pattern of behaviour? The “game” has changed as a general consensus.
The use of the word “drone” itself is a point of contention. Many feel that it’s an inadequate term. Because the world of unmanned aerial vehicles has evolved far beyond the simple quadcopters many imagine. The terminology is so broad that it can encompass anything from a hobbyist’s toy to a sophisticated, military-grade aircraft. Some suggest using the term “UAP” to reflect the uncertainty. The public may see that these are probably not the little “drones” of yesteryear, rather, a very serious matter.
The availability of commercial drones to civilians is another point of worry. While it is true that these small aircraft are not a replacement for something larger, the technology is readily available to the general public. The fact that someone can buy a drone from the mall raises questions about the potential for misuse.
The response from various countries highlights the lack of dedicated military radars for drone detection. Unlike Poland, many European nations do not have the same level of radar coverage directed towards potential aggressors. This explains why Poland was able to act so fast.
There’s a healthy dose of skepticism in the air as well, fueled by reports of “sensationalized” articles. A reminder to check sources and critically assess the information presented is essential. There is also a feeling that the governments do not want to scare the public and have to withhold information in the interest of national security.
The overall sentiment is one of urgency, frustration, and a call for decisive action. The unknown nature of these flying objects over German soil and the critical sites targeted, has a lot of people in the community uneasy. The question remains, what exactly are these “drones”, and what are they up to? And more importantly, what are we going to do about it? The “new reality” is the one we’re living in right now.