By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Tesla Cybertruck has been denied approval for use on German roads due to safety concerns regarding its sharp stainless steel body, failing to comply with European Union regulations. A recent communication from the U.S. Army Customs Agency confirmed that US military personnel are prohibited from importing the vehicle. The refusal stems from significant passive safety concerns, particularly regarding pedestrian, cyclist, and motorcyclist protection. Consequently, service members who attempt to import the Cybertruck to Germany risk having to ship it back to the United States at their own expense.
Read the original article here
Germany and the US Army have indeed advised soldiers to leave their Cybertrucks at home. It’s a situation that’s sparked a lot of discussion, and frankly, some amusement. The Cybertruck, with its unconventional design and sheer size, simply isn’t fitting in well with the requirements of military life in Germany.
The practicalities are a major issue. Imagine trying to navigate those tight European roads in a vehicle that’s already considered large in America. It’s not just about the width; the Cybertruck’s overall dimensions make it a bit of a liability on roads and in parking situations that just aren’t designed for it. This leads to real-world challenges for soldiers who own or are considering purchasing one.
Beyond the physical limitations, there are some serious regulatory hurdles. The Cybertruck, for a variety of reasons including safety, doesn’t comply with European Union regulations. This is a deal-breaker, as these rules apply to all vehicles used by US military personnel in Germany. The fact that the Cybertruck isn’t even officially sold in the EU is also a clear indicator of its unsuitability for use there.
Then there are security concerns. The Cybertruck, packed with technology, raises questions about data security. The idea that a vehicle with extensive camera systems could potentially be exploited for data gathering poses a threat, especially near sensitive military installations. This security risk, particularly in the context of the current administration’s security record, makes the Cybertruck a questionable choice for military personnel.
Looking beyond the regulatory and security issues, the economics of owning a Cybertruck for many soldiers simply doesn’t add up. The reality is that the majority of service members aren’t going to be able to afford such an expensive vehicle. While some higher-ranking officers might be able to swing it, the average soldier is more likely to be focused on managing their finances, not spending their entire paycheck on a luxury vehicle.
The Cybertruck’s size and design are not exactly welcomed by all. Some people describe it as something that looks more like a placeholder model for a dystopian cyberpunk game. There’s a general sentiment that the design is awkward and out of place, which, combined with its size and cost, makes it a target of, well, a few jokes and some serious criticism.
It’s also worth noting that for those serving overseas, the issue isn’t limited to Germany. Importing a Cybertruck into the UK has resulted in a swift impounding. This further emphasizes the vehicle’s unsuitability in many international locations, and underlines that its usability is not solely a German problem.
In the end, this whole situation just highlights the complexities of military life and the challenges of integrating new technologies. While the Cybertruck might be a head-turner, it’s not exactly a practical or welcome vehicle on German roads for US soldiers. The decision reflects a mix of practical considerations, regulatory requirements, and security concerns, ultimately leading to the directive to keep those Cybertrucks parked back in the States.