By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s address to military leaders on September 30, 2025, was marked by highly unusual rhetoric. He called on the armed forces to confront an internal enemy and suggested utilizing American cities for military training exercises. This unprecedented statement has raised concerns among observers like Paul Rieckhoff, the founder and CEO of Independent Veterans of America. The specifics of the address suggest a dramatic shift in presidential tone.
Read the original article here
It appears Trump’s call for what essentially amounted to a war on American citizens, delivered in front of the nation’s top military leaders, was met with a chilling, almost palpable silence. The lack of any outward reaction from the generals, a silence so deafening it spoke volumes, is a crucial piece of this unfolding narrative. It begs the question: what does this stoic response truly signify?
Some might interpret this silence as a sign of silent protest. That the military leaders were, at the very least, uncomfortable with Trump’s incendiary rhetoric and his apparent willingness to use the armed forces against the American people. Perhaps they were quietly signaling their disapproval, letting it be known that they wouldn’t condone such actions. However, it’s also just as easy to imagine it as a long-standing tradition of the military to avoid injecting themselves into politics, regardless of their personal feelings. This view suggests that their silence was not necessarily a sign of resistance, but simply a matter of protocol.
There is another perspective to consider, a more unsettling one: that the military is simply an extension of the President’s will. That they would, at the end of the day, fall in line and obey orders, even if those orders were to be against the American people. This perspective, if true, paints a disturbing picture. This is made more concerning by the over-armored, over-armed people within the military and law enforcement. Trump deploying troops to cities, advocating for using them as training grounds, and even suggesting a violent “You Spit, We hit” policy towards citizens all show a lack of restraint in their approach to power, a frightening proposition if that sentiment is reflected in the actions of the military brass. If they were going to speak out against these things, one would think, they would have done so already.
Regardless of the reasons behind the silence, the stakes are high. Military leaders have a clear duty to uphold the Constitution, and that includes defending it against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. If Trump were to issue unlawful orders, to target American citizens, these generals and admirals have a responsibility not to comply. They are, at the very least, supposed to refuse and take actions in line with their commitment to the Constitution. The lack of response, the stony silence, is all the more unsettling, as Trump’s statements were essentially a dangerous escalation.
The events described also highlight the potential for a real crisis. A general strike might be a way to dismantle the problem, but the consequences of losing jobs and income are very real. One hopes that the Armed Forces will be the ones that lead the way if they are to step in and defend the Constitution, while the right wing media seems to be claiming that the generals were silently reverent during the event. The very people charged with upholding the Constitution were in a room with a man who spoke in a dangerous fashion, and no action was taken.
The whole situation is even more concerning when considering the personal backgrounds of those involved. As if a President with a history of draft dodging, and a Secretary of Defense with public issues with alcohol, is speaking on a topic as sensitive as these. The implications are chilling and show a blatant disregard for the military, the Constitution, and the American people.
The situation serves as a reminder of the seriousness of this moment. To have a leader declaring war on half of us is a very serious matter. The silence of the generals may be interpreted in several ways, each one as potentially dangerous as the others. The military’s oath to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is being tested. Now, more than ever, the actions of these leaders will determine the direction of our country.