By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Senator Ruben Gallego believes Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision not to reconvene the House during the government shutdown will likely cost him his speakership. Johnson’s leadership has faced criticism, notably from within his own party, with some, like Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, advocating for the House to return and address issues like Affordable Care Act subsidies. This inaction, coupled with the ongoing impasse between Senate Democrats and Republicans over ACA funding, has drawn further scrutiny. Gallego suggests that Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s failure to address the situation with their members demonstrates a lack of negotiation for a resolution.
Read the original article here
Gallego: Johnson ‘probably going to lose the Speakership’ – That statement definitely seems to be the crux of what’s on a lot of people’s minds right now. And frankly, it’s hard to disagree. The current political climate, particularly within the Republican party, appears to be a powder keg waiting to explode, and Speaker Johnson might be the unfortunate soul holding the match.
It appears the frustration directed at Johnson is fueled by a variety of factors. Some of the most common issues involve his decisions regarding bringing the House into session, his perceived lack of a clear plan regarding the Affordable Care Act, and his overall leadership style. Then there’s the elephant in the room: the ever-present shadow of Donald Trump. It feels like Trump’s influence, or lack thereof, heavily influences Johnson’s future. Many feel that the Speaker’s fate is intertwined with Trump’s, and if Trump’s power wanes, Johnson is likely to follow suit.
Now, the big question is: who would replace him? Based on what’s being said, nobody seems particularly eager for the job. The very fact that Republicans seem to perpetually have issues with their Speaker suggests a fundamental problem within the party: a lack of unity and a constant drive to oppose rather than govern, especially when faced with the control of government. It’s easy to see why someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is known for stirring the pot, might find herself in the mix.
The situation also highlights the complicated dance of political survival. The comments certainly suggest that Greene’s actions, while often seen as controversial, are primarily driven by her self-interest. Whether it’s about securing her own position or maneuvering for future power, it’s clear that she’s adapting to a changing political landscape. This includes trying to distance herself from Trump and aligning, at least temporarily, with positions that could offer her political benefit.
The dynamics at play are certainly fascinating. The talk of “motions to vacate,” the potential release of the Epstein files, and the general feeling that the GOP is on the verge of collapse all add to the sense of instability. The situation appears to be a high-stakes game of political chess. In a way, the fact that a figure like Greene might be able to capitalize on this chaos is a testament to the turmoil.
In the midst of all of this, it appears there’s a sense of frustration with the entire Republican party. It’s been observed that they don’t necessarily want to govern, but rather to oppose and blame Democrats. The situation is a reflection of this problem within their party as well. This makes it even more difficult to see a clear path forward, especially with constant internal conflicts and power struggles.
It’s also worth noting the cynicism that seems to permeate these discussions. There’s a feeling that, regardless of who’s in charge, the underlying problems within the party and within the government will persist. This is quite apparent from the comments about those on both sides of the aisle. It feels like the American people are caught in the middle of a constant political battle.
Ultimately, the sentiment is that the situation is one where Johnson is likely to fail. Whether it happens soon, and whether it’s caused by external or internal factors, there is the overall feeling that the present leadership is on its way out. The underlying message appears to be that Johnson may not be long for his current role. And who will replace him? That is the question everyone seems to be asking.