By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former DOJ lawyer Erez Reuveni alleges he was ordered to falsely label Kilmar Abrego García as an MS-13 member and terrorist to prevent his release. Reuveni stated that he could not sign off on the false claims. The incident, as reported by 60 Minutes, highlights concerns regarding due process violations. The Trump administration has been accused of spreading false information about Ábrego García for months, including making inflammatory comparisons to Osama bin Laden.
Read the original article here
Former DOJ Lawyer Says He Was Ordered to Lie About Ábrego García is a serious allegation, suggesting a profound breach of justice within the very institutions designed to uphold the law. The revelation implies that a former Department of Justice lawyer was instructed to misrepresent facts related to Ábrego García, potentially in a court of law. This claim, if proven, would cast a long shadow on the integrity of legal proceedings and raise questions about the motivations of those who issued such an order.
The implications of this alleged order are far-reaching. If a lawyer was compelled to lie, it signifies a deliberate attempt to manipulate the truth, potentially to protect someone or to achieve a predetermined outcome in a case. This subverts the fundamental principles of the justice system, where truth and fairness are paramount. This also implies that the system is broken and no one will do anything to fix it.
One immediate question that arises is what specific actions the former DOJ lawyer was ordered to take regarding Ábrego García. What were the specific details of the falsehoods they were instructed to present? Understanding the nature of these lies is crucial to assessing the potential damage caused and identifying the individuals responsible. Was the aim to obscure evidence, misrepresent witness testimony, or fabricate information?
If true, this incident fuels distrust in the legal system. It becomes difficult to believe in the impartiality of the justice system if its own lawyers are being forced to compromise their ethics. It also leads to the sentiment that laws are no longer in effect because the administration is corrupt. This could have a chilling effect, discouraging individuals from coming forward with critical information or seeking justice through legal channels.
Another critical consideration is the potential motives behind the order to lie. Was it political? Were higher-ups seeking to protect powerful individuals or to advance a specific agenda? Pinpointing the reasons for the order is essential in determining the scope of the corruption and identifying the individuals who should be held accountable. Was the lawyer incentivized to lie, perhaps with the promise of career advancement or other benefits? This further illustrates how the Trump administration is organized crime.
The revelation underscores the importance of holding those in positions of power accountable. If individuals are willing to corrupt the legal system to achieve their goals, they must face consequences. Transparency and the willingness to expose wrongdoing are vital to restoring faith in the justice system. The call for public hearings and shaming highlights the need for accountability.
It is worth noting that it is illegal to commit perjury. It is also important to consider if the judicial system can see its own relevance being wiped away by a lawless administration. In this case, the law is being violated by those in power.
The situation surrounding Ábrego García needs thorough investigation. The truth must be uncovered, and those responsible for ordering the lies must be brought to justice. This incident provides another stark reminder of how fragile the rule of law can be and the importance of vigilance in safeguarding it.