By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Senator John Fetterman’s fundraising in the third quarter of this year was the lowest since he announced his candidacy. His campaign raised under $330,000 and spent nearly $575,000 during this period, marking the third consecutive quarter where spending exceeded income. This dip, which is noteworthy, has led to speculation that his position among his party’s financial supporters might be in question. Other Democratic figures, such as Brendan Boyle, are also out-raising Fetterman, which could lead to challenges in the upcoming years.
Read the original article here
Pa. Sen. John Fetterman’s fundraising woes continue, and it seems like a lot of people aren’t exactly shedding tears about it. The sentiment is pretty clear: many feel betrayed by his shift in political stances, and that’s reflected in a noticeable decline in financial support. It’s a classic case of actions having consequences, and in this case, the consequence is a dwindling war chest.
Also, the current economic climate is playing a part. With the economy’s challenges, donations from everyday people across the board are likely to decrease. This means Fetterman is facing a double whammy: disillusionment from his base and a tougher environment for fundraising in general. The feeling is that he’s gone against the interests of those who put him in office, causing them to withdraw their financial backing.
Furthermore, a significant portion of the comments express a sense of disappointment and even anger. Some former supporters now openly express their desire to see him fail, with several saying they’d love to see him lose in a primary. The general consensus appears to be that he abandoned the platform he ran on, and that he’s essentially become a Republican in Democrat’s clothing.
There’s a lot of talk about how he’s been voting against the interests of his constituents and has even had one of the worst attendance records in the Senate. This has undoubtedly contributed to the negative perception. The core issue is that Fetterman’s actions, in the eyes of many, don’t align with the promises he made during his campaign.
It seems many are pointing to how he was beloved during his Senate run. But since he stopped representing the values his constituents voted for, he lost their support. This has led to the question of whether or not he will be primary challenged by another Democrat, as some people have mentioned they would happily donate to that Democrat.
The role of political fundraising in America is also touched upon. The fact that elected officials spend so much of their time soliciting donations is viewed with a mixture of bemusement and disapproval. Some people note that this seems to be a uniquely American phenomenon. The constant need for money to fuel campaigns and maintain political relevance is seen as a somewhat cynical aspect of the system.
Some of the more pointed comments suggest his shift to the right is the result of his stroke. Regardless of the reasons, the feeling is that he’s lost touch with the people who got him elected. His change in political alignment has alienated a lot of people, with some saying his new alignment is with a group that previously despised him.
The idea that he’s now seeking financial support from those who he used to criticize is also a recurring theme. The sentiment is that he’s reaping what he sowed, and it seems many people are enjoying seeing the consequences of his political choices.
The mention of AIPAC and other Republican groups stepping in to fund his campaigns is also a popular concern. The implication is that he’s no longer reliant on the support of the people who voted him in. Some believe that he is no longer accountable to his original supporters, and is now working in the best interests of a different group of donors.
The financial struggles of Fetterman are seen as a result of his shift in political positions, with the general feeling being that he has abandoned his base and is now paying the price. His campaign in 2022 was successful. But now, it appears, that he is having trouble raising enough funds.