By John Q. Hosedrinker A U.S. District Judge has found that ICE agents violated a consent decree concerning warrantless arrests in the Chicago area and unlawfully detained over two dozen individuals. The ruling, part of an extended consent decree lasting until 2026, imposes limits on such arrests and requires ICE to report the number of warrant-less arrests. This stems from a lawsuit accusing ICE of violating the 2022 Castañon Nava settlement, which established conditions for warrant-less arrests. The court found ICE’s arguments for carrying blank warrant forms meritless, ordering retraining for violating officers and increased reporting requirements.
Read the original article here
Warrantless Arrests by ICE in Chicago Area Ruled Unlawful by Federal Judge. It’s a recurring pattern, isn’t it? This idea that the law is being bent, stretched, and sometimes outright ignored. This time, it’s about warrantless arrests by ICE in the Chicago area, and a federal judge has stepped in to say, “No, you can’t do that.”
“You can’t do that,” the judiciary seems to be saying. But the response? Often, it’s a shrug and a continuation of the action. The executive branch, under certain leadership, seems to ask, “Who’s going to stop us?” It’s a frustrating situation, where the legal system makes its decisions, but enforcement feels… lacking. We hear the judges, but the action on the ground? Not always what’s ordered.
The implications are significant. These were not legal detentions, but abductions in effect. The situation calls for action. The ruling needs to be enforced. Governor Pritzker could step in and use local detectives and police to investigate and arrest ICE agents who are making these illegal arrests. It’s a clear violation of rights, and it demands a clear response.
It’s easy to get discouraged. To think that the law is weak, that the courts are fighting a losing battle. But what if we started with the law, right here, right now? What if we started with a strong defense of what is legal? This ruling sets the stage, and it demands an action. Who is going to enforce this?
The idea of a “judicial police” might seem radical, but it speaks to a real need. The current balance of power is broken. Imagine a dedicated force whose sole job is to enforce court rulings, to ensure that those in positions of power are held accountable when they violate the Constitution and judicial orders. This is a matter of principle.
Those who had their rights infringed need compensation. Democrats, when they regain power, need to promise to remove qualified immunity. This would hold each ICE agent individually liable for these unlawful actions. The world sees this and mocks the very idea of what this country stands for. This whole thing needs to be solved.
Imagine the fear, the uncertainty, of being apprehended illegally. If these actions are illegal, then they are kidnappings. These individuals were not processed lawfully. So what is the plan to get them out? The court needs to sanction the ICE agents who broke the law. If they have to cough up money, they’ll pay attention. Yes, but nothing ever happens. The courts issue a ruling to cease for a week or two and then it is back to our new normal. No consequences are faced. Citizens need to group up and detain ICE, call the cops to pick them up. They don’t have warrants. No one is coming to save us, only we can change this.
We’ve seen it before: a ruling of “unlawful” but without consequences. It’s as if the court is saying, “Naughty, naughty,” and then allowing the behavior to continue. We need actual consequences. We need to hold people accountable. It isn’t enough to simply say that something is illegal; that’s not how we make these kinds of changes.
It’s almost absurd that a judge has to state the obvious. The GOP’s reaction at best seems to be seeing how far they can push it. These were abductions. It’s a question of who is going to get these people out. We need a real remedy.
The current climate is such that the judiciary’s authority is being undermined. If actions are not taken, those who are acting outside the law will continue. The law needs to be enforced to be useful. The court needs to give these people the means to enforce their rulings. It is time to act on this ruling and send a strong message: the rule of law matters.
This isn’t just about the Chicago area. The same thing could be said about any state or any place. What steps can be taken to ensure that this ruling is upheld? If this situation is a violation of the law, does the governor and the Attorney General have the means to file arrest warrants for the criminals kidnapping people in their state? So genuinely, what can actually be done? Can the police start arresting ICE agents for breaking the law?
The response from many cops is likely to be, and has been, to do nothing. The cops are not going to go against their friends. But imagine if the police were the heroes, standing up for the rule of law. Enforcement is in the hands of the executive branch lol.
The “law and order” crowd needs to be held accountable and see how their words line up with actions. Perhaps one solution is to contact local Sheriffs, and ask what action they are willing to take to protect the law and follow court orders. The U Visa may be what these people need. If ICE and the administration are ever brought to justice, I hope every last one of the people they’ve unlawfully “arrested” and denied due process are given a green card and a path to citizenship, should they want it.