By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Subramanyam “Subu” Vedam, recently exonerated after serving over four decades for a murder conviction, has been detained by ICE and faces potential deportation to India. Despite the dismissal of murder charges against him this month, ICE cited a 1988 deportation order related to his vacated convictions. Vedam, who maintained his innocence and was a lawful permanent resident, was initially convicted in 1983, after being accused of the 1980 murder of a former classmate. His attorney argues that, given his long incarceration and pending citizenship application at the time of his arrest, Vedam should be allowed to rebuild his life in the United States.
Read the original article here
Pennsylvania man wrongfully imprisoned for more than 40 years faces deportation after Ice arrest. It’s truly a gut-wrenching situation, isn’t it? After spending over four decades in prison for a crime he didn’t commit, you’d think this man, Vedam, would finally get a break. But instead, he’s facing deportation after being taken into custody by ICE. The story is a real head-scratcher, and the more you learn, the more unsettling it becomes.
The agency, in a statement that feels almost accusatory, claims Vedam is a “career criminal” with a rap sheet dating back to 1980. They also point to a drug conviction, specifically for a controlled substance, as a reason for his detention. The irony, or perhaps the tragedy, is that this man’s life has been, for all intents and purposes, stolen. He was brought to the US at just nine months old. He grew up here, spent his formative years in the system due to a wrongful conviction, and now, after being exonerated for the murder, is staring down the barrel of deportation. It’s enough to make you wonder where justice has gone.
The core issue seems to hinge on that drug conviction. While he was exonerated for the murder, the drug charge remains. The details are important here. He wasn’t convicted of drug trafficking, but of intent to distribute LSD, a charge that arose from a plea deal. Under US immigration law, a felony-level drug offense, even if it stems from a plea bargain, makes a person permanently inadmissible. There are apparently no waivers or loopholes that can help him. This means deportation is the likely outcome.
It’s also crucial to understand that ICE didn’t act on its own in this case. A federal judge signed a deportation order. This order was based not just on the murder conviction (which was later overturned), but also on that older drug conviction from the 1980s. This isn’t just a case of overzealous immigration enforcement; it’s a systematic consequence of a plea deal and the unforgiving nature of immigration law for those with a criminal record, regardless of the circumstances.
The situation is made even more disheartening when you consider the kind of person Vedam seems to be. While incarcerated, he earned multiple degrees, including a Master of Business Administration with a perfect GPA. He received over 50 commendations for his volunteer work. He founded and led literacy programs for inmates, helping countless individuals complete their education. He taught himself Spanish to help more people learn to read, organized fundraisers, and even acted as an unofficial health counselor. The narrative from ICE, portraying him as a hardened criminal, clashes dramatically with the image of a man who appears to have dedicated himself to self-improvement and helping others, even while unjustly imprisoned.
The fact that he’s being targeted for deportation to a country he likely has very little connection to further compounds the injustice. He has spent his entire adult life behind bars in the US. The idea of him being sent to India, a place he likely doesn’t remember and has no ties to, after being wrongly incarcerated for so long feels incredibly cruel.
It’s worth noting that the original article didn’t specifically state that he was a drug trafficker but that he faced charges of possessing and intending to distribute LSD. These distinctions matter when we talk about law and intent. However, the intent to distribute charge is what becomes a problem. The commenter has pointed out that the plea deal may have been the right strategy for criminal prosecution but led to negative consequences in regards to immigration. That’s why, in such situations, a “Crimmigation” lawyer is needed.
The comments in this situation show frustration with the situation. The language that’s used conveys feelings of anger, disgust, and disbelief, highlighting the emotional impact of this case. The accusations of a Nazi-like enforcement and tactics certainly bring into question the ethics and morality of the situation. Some commenters are expressing intense anger towards those responsible and the system in general. They are calling for dramatic change.
The case of Vedam is a stark reminder of the complexities and potential injustices within the legal system. It highlights the lasting consequences of wrongful convictions and the often inflexible nature of immigration laws. It’s a story that demands attention and, hopefully, a reevaluation of the way we approach justice and compassion.