By John Q. Hosedrinker 
EU member states have agreed to eliminate all remaining gas imports from Russia by the end of 2027, representing a significant move towards energy independence. The plan, endorsed by energy ministers, encompasses both pipeline gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports, with the European Commission aiming for an earlier phase-out of LNG by January 2027. While most nations supported the initiative, Hungary and Slovakia expressed concerns due to their reliance on Russian gas. This regulation, expected to gain approval from the European Parliament, will ban new Russian gas import contracts from January 1, 2026, and allow existing contracts a transitional period.
Read the original article here
EU agrees to stop importing Russian gas by end of 2027, and that’s the headline. The idea is that the European Union is aiming to completely cut off its reliance on Russian natural gas within the next few years. Now, this isn’t a snap-of-the-fingers kind of thing, but it’s a significant shift in energy policy. Before the war in Ukraine, a substantial chunk of the EU’s gas imports, around 45%, came from Russia. The good news is that figure has already dropped dramatically, now sitting under 19%.
The path to zero isn’t a sprint. One has to realize that diversifying gas supply, especially for landlocked countries, is a complex operation. There aren’t pipelines magically sprouting up with alternative sources at the ready. It takes time, investment, and a whole lot of logistical maneuvering. Think of it like this: if your primary gas source suddenly dries up, you can’t just flip a switch and get it from somewhere else.
It’s also worth pointing out that when we talk about this, the focus is often on a handful of countries. A large percentage of the gas imports from Russia are actually concentrated in a relatively small number of EU member states, maybe just three or four, who account for the majority of that 19%. So, when we see “EU” in the headlines, it’s not like the entire continent is equally reliant on Russian gas.
This deadline, set for the end of 2027, also seems to be moving up, if you consider the original timelines. It’s almost surprising to see the EU trying to accelerate these kinds of changes. One could see it as a sign of the urgency of the situation. Some countries are more vocal in their concerns, like Hungary, who have voiced reservations, citing their geographical challenges as a reason for their continued dependence on Russian gas.
Speaking of Hungary, they may need to find alternative solutions, and fast. The war in Ukraine is ongoing, and the potential for disruptions to supply chains, from any source, remains a real concern. Diversifying the energy sources is the key.
Let’s also be clear: the goal isn’t just about not *using* Russian gas; it’s about not being *dependent* on Russia to buy it. They’ve shown how they can use energy as a weapon, and that’s the problem that needs to be addressed. The EU needs to ensure that it has diverse options and is no longer vulnerable to Russia’s geopolitical games.
Some people have pointed out that you can still end up with Russian gas indirectly. For example, if EU countries import from India, which in turn buys from Russia, does that truly change the situation? The answer is…it depends. While it may not be ideal, the key is the dependency and the ability to control supply. The goal is to reduce Russia’s leverage, even if it means some gas still finds its way in through circuitous routes.
It’s easy to be cynical and say this is all too slow, that it should have happened sooner, but let’s consider the bigger picture. This all started way back, perhaps as far back as the early 2000’s or even 2014, and there were already warnings about the over-reliance on Russian gas. The recent invasion of Ukraine just highlighted the issue, giving the EU a swift kick to get the ball rolling faster on its diversification plans.
It is worth noting that the EU is working on this. Sanctions and regulations are already kicking in, forcing companies to find alternative suppliers and prove the origin of their gas. This kind of transformation takes time, and the pressure is on.
When discussing the specifics, you have to be mindful about the difference between gasoline and natural gas. Some confusion has arised, as India, for example, primarily ships oil and gasoline, but doesn’t have major LNG production. The focus here is on the natural gas that the EU is getting away from. The EU is buying gas at market prices from other countries, and Russia is losing money. That’s a shift.
It is important to remember that the EU is diversifying its sources away from Russia. The current sources for the EU are quite diverse, including the United States, Norway, and countries in the Middle East. It is a good step towards ensuring that the EU is not held hostage by a single supplier.