By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Reports indicate a significant drone attack on Moscow and surrounding areas, with Russian authorities claiming that 30 drones were targeting the capital. Explosions were reported across Moscow Oblast, including within Moscow itself, with eyewitness photos showing smoke in the village of Kommunarka. Operations were temporarily suspended at Domodedovo and Zhukovsky airports due to the attack. Subsequently, operations at both airports have resumed.
Read the original article here
Dozens of drones hit Moscow and Moscow Oblast, explosions heard – well, that certainly grabbed my attention first thing in the morning! It’s hard not to be somewhat amused, even with the serious implications of the situation. From the initial reactions, it seems a lot of people are experiencing a mix of emotions, ranging from a kind of gleeful satisfaction to a pragmatic assessment of the strategic implications.
The discussion quickly moves to what this could mean strategically. The idea that Ukraine might be trying to “bring the war home” to Moscow is a common thread. The aim could be to force Russia to divert resources from the front lines, or perhaps, as some suggest, to disrupt the sense of normalcy that Moscow residents have been accustomed to. It is as if Ukraine is saying, “You wanted to bring this to us? Well, here is a taste of it.”
The damage itself seems relatively minor, at least initially. There is also discussion on the perceived effectiveness of Russian air defenses. It’s suggested that the majority of damage may have been caused by Russia’s own anti-aircraft systems, which, let’s be honest, is darkly humorous in a very specific way. Some are speculating that the attack could be a test, to map out the defense systems around the capital, with the expectation of more significant strikes to follow.
The number of drones used is a key point of consideration. Thirty might not seem like a lot, but the consensus is that the impact is more about the message than the physical destruction. Several people mention that the number of drones to overwhelm Moscow’s air defense would probably be in the hundreds, perhaps even a thousand. Some are making the valid point that the scale is still a far cry from the devastation that Russia has inflicted on Ukrainian cities.
Of course, the specter of nuclear weapons is never far from the surface. The question of whether this could provoke a nuclear response from Russia is something that many consider. Some hold the strong belief that Putin won’t resort to nuclear weapons because, as one comment puts it, “he can’t”. Using nukes would be a sign of weakness, and would likely unite the rest of the world against Russia.
The tactic of drawing the war closer to Moscow seems to be a key element of the conversation. The intent is to show the Russian population the consequences of the “special operation” and perhaps to erode support for the conflict. The attacks could also be aimed at specific industrial targets in and around Moscow, which are undoubtedly connected to the war effort.
The possibility of escalating the conflict is also being discussed, and the idea of targeting critical infrastructure in Russia, specifically their power grid, is brought up, in retaliation for similar actions against Ukraine. A bit of a tit-for-tat dynamic, which, let’s face it, is a familiar feature of modern warfare. The general sense is that the aim is to ensure that the air defenses remain concentrated near Moscow.
Many are speculating about the purpose of the attacks. It’s been brought up that one of the objectives is to tie down Moscow’s air defense assets, making them less available to protect strategic locations like those on the front lines. The thought is that this strategy could give Ukraine a distinct advantage in other areas.
Many people think that this is a smart strategic maneuver. It’s a way to keep the pressure on Russia without directly attacking the front lines. The focus is to make Russia work harder for its own defense and also provide a reminder of what war really means.
The overall tone of the discussion is a mixture of concern, strategy, and a certain dark humor. The attacks on Moscow have clearly struck a nerve, prompting a wide range of responses, from those who see it as a welcome development, to those who are focusing on the more dangerous implications. It appears to be a clear indication that the war is far from over, and that it is evolving in complex and unpredictable ways.