By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Cracker Barrel has ended its relationship with design firm Prophet after the company’s controversial brand refresh, which included a new logo and restaurant redesigns, sparked significant backlash and impacted the company’s traffic. The revamped logo, replacing the iconic imagery, was swiftly reversed. Restaurant redesigns, initiated at a few locations, were also halted. Furthermore, the company announced leadership changes, including the departure of its VP of Marketing and the return of a former executive to focus on food and hospitality.
Read the original article here
Cracker Barrel dumps the design firm behind its disastrous logo change, and honestly, can you blame them? It seems the entire episode was a masterclass in corporate self-sabotage, and now someone has to take the fall. Based on everything I’ve gathered, it appears the restaurant chain, after a particularly tone-deaf and unwelcome logo redesign, has parted ways with the design firm responsible for the mess. It’s a fitting end to what seems to be a textbook example of how *not* to update a brand identity.
It’s almost comical how this whole thing played out. From what I understand, the Cracker Barrel C-suite, presumably after much deliberation, gave the green light for a modern, streamlined update. They wanted something “simple and streamlined”, a request that was apparently followed to a tee by the graphic designers. The higher-ups, as the story goes, signed off on the new design, which seemed to be exactly what they asked for. Fast forward to the backlash, and suddenly the design firm became the scapegoat, fired for failing to deliver a vision that apparently contradicted the brand’s original themes. The irony isn’t lost on me.
The whole saga reeks of bad decision-making from the very top. It’s like the executives were utterly clueless, not anticipating any negative reactions, despite the obvious potential for controversy. Now, I get it: companies update their logos all the time. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. But this particular redesign seemed to land with a thud, especially considering the current political climate. The details were stripped away, and what remained wasn’t exactly a roaring success. It’s a shame, because as a maximalist I prefer more unique and detailed logos.
And let’s be clear, the redesign wasn’t just about aesthetics. It seems the design removed some of the elements and details people like. It’s almost as if they didn’t consider the company’s customer base at all. Perhaps they underestimated how much people care about their comfort foods and the aesthetic of the brand. It’s like they forgot how passionate people are about their favorite brands.
The whole affair has a whiff of the “MBA upper manager” trying to fix something that wasn’t broken. The fact that the backlash seemed to be fueled by bot activity doesn’t make it any less embarrassing for Cracker Barrel. They’re now left to deal with the damage, and someone had to be held accountable.
The question now is, what happens next? Well, from what I gather, Cracker Barrel has already reverted to the old logo. It appears the whole thing was a ploy to get press and remind people of their existence. However, the damage is done, and the brand’s reputation has taken a hit. The former VP of Marketing, who was probably pushing for this particular direction, is likely regretting the whole thing.
Ultimately, this whole episode is a cautionary tale about the perils of corporate enshittification. It’s a reminder that you can’t just strip away what made a brand unique and expect everyone to be happy. It’s a lesson in knowing your audience, understanding the cultural landscape, and, maybe most importantly, not hiring a design firm only to ignore their professional expertise. You pay them for a reason!
And let’s be real, the new logo wasn’t great. It was just lazy ass design, and the background could have looked like an actual barrel! It wasn’t just a simple redesign, it was just bad. It’s a shame, because so many companies do a great job of rebranding, but for every success story, there’s a Cracker Barrel.
So, as we watch Cracker Barrel lick its wounds and figure out its next move, it’s hard not to feel like this whole thing was a massive self-inflicted wound. But on the other hand, there is something satisfying about seeing a company face the consequences of its missteps. Maybe this will be the start of a trend where corporate America starts to prioritize quality, service, and experience over bland, mass-produced sameness. Maybe we can get some cool old-school Vegas-style buffets for cheap again. Now, that would be something.