By John Q. Hosedrinker 
HuffPost is dedicated to delivering independent, fact-based journalism to its readers. To ensure this commitment continues, readers are encouraged to become members and support the newsroom. This support is crucial for sustaining the publication, especially during challenging periods. The publication expresses its gratitude for past support and appeals for ongoing backing to shape the future of independent journalism.
Read the original article here
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s call for a general strike is a significant escalation. It’s not just a political statement; it’s a direct challenge to the status quo, aiming to disrupt the system that many feel is rigged against the working class. The bold move reflects a growing sentiment of discontent and a desire for more impactful action. This is about more than just a protest; it’s about leveraging the power of the people to bring about fundamental change. The idea is simple: if the workforce stops working, the economy grinds to a halt, forcing those in power to listen.
This bold move resonates with a history of labor movements in the United States. Though a nationwide general strike hasn’t been successfully executed in the US, the “great strike wave of 1946” shows the power of collective action when workers unite to demand better conditions and address economic instability. It’s a testament to the belief that real change comes from the bottom up, from the people who are the engine of the economy. The call for a general strike taps into this legacy, encouraging people to consider their collective power.
The proposed action is not without its practical considerations. A general strike, by its nature, would disrupt daily life. The conversation touches on the potential economic hardships that such a strike might bring, with many raising the question of how individuals would manage to pay rent, buy food, and cover bills. Addressing these concerns is crucial. The response highlights the importance of mutual aid networks, community support, and organized efforts to prepare for and sustain a strike of this magnitude. It’s about building solidarity and ensuring that no one is left behind.
The core motivation behind the call for a general strike is the belief that the current system is not serving the best interests of the majority. The proposed goals are ambitious, from ending private contributions to elections, abolishing the electoral college, and addressing healthcare as a human right to taxing wealth instead of work and breaking up monopolies. These are fundamental shifts, meant to address what is seen as a corrupt and inequitable system. The call recognizes that these changes won’t come easily.
The potential impact of such a strike is immense, and its success hinges on widespread participation. There is a palpable sense of anticipation and hope, along with the very real practical questions and doubts about what such a strike would entail and its potential. A successful general strike would force the ruling class to engage with the demands of the people, and potentially restructure the entire system.