Two North Korean prisoners of war, captured while fighting for Russia in Ukraine, have pleaded with a documentary producer to be brought to South Korea. The captives, in their 20s, expressed this desire during a meeting at a Ukrainian prisoner camp, a shift from an earlier meeting where only one expressed a wish to defect. The soldiers requested various items and conveyed psychological instability and past attempts of self-harm, according to officials. South Korea has notified Ukraine of its intention to receive them if their wishes are confirmed, as North Korea has deployed significant troops to fight alongside Russia.
Read the original article here
Captured North Korean war prisoners in Ukraine ask to be brought to South Korea, a scenario that presents a complex and deeply human dilemma. It seems ironic, doesn’t it, that soldiers sent to fight and possibly die for a regime that values secrecy above all else, now find themselves in a situation offering them a glimpse of freedom? They were likely told to choose death over capture, to protect their country’s involvement in a war they probably didn’t even understand. Now, they’re in a position to choose a life outside of the iron grip of North Korea.
For these captured soldiers, surviving the war is the first victory, but then comes the possibility of a second. The chance to live in South Korea, a free country, is a stark contrast to the life they knew. The most immediate concern, understandably, revolves around their families. The North Korean regime is known for its brutal punishments against those who defect, or whose family members defect. Although there’s some debate regarding the severity of these repercussions, the fear is palpable. The choices presented are incredibly difficult: sever ties with family, and seek a life of relative freedom, or return to face the regime’s wrath with a hope to protect family.
It’s tempting to see this as a simple choice between freedom and oppression, but the reality is more nuanced. Many of these soldiers have been heavily brainwashed, and genuinely believe in the inferiority of the outside world. They may have a limited understanding of what awaits them in South Korea, and they might fear the cultural shock, the potential ostracization, and the economic hardships. On the other hand, the alternative is almost certainly worse: the potential for torture, execution, and the enslavement of their extended family. The possibility of “disappearing” while in captivity, with their families being compensated for their loss, is also a consideration.
The fact that these soldiers are now in Ukraine has broadened their horizons. Exposure to the internet, through interactions with Russian soldiers, and potentially other sources of information is transformative. They’re seeing a world beyond the tightly controlled narrative of the North Korean regime. Many North Korean refugees are already living in South Korea, a fact that offers a beacon of hope and a tangible pathway to a different future. These soldiers, and others in similar situations, already speak the language and are recognized by the South Korean government. However, the path to a better life is far from guaranteed. South Korea’s job market and schooling can be extremely competitive, particularly for those arriving from the North with a different skillset, and this reality can create significant challenges.
The difficulties of starting a new life in South Korea shouldn’t overshadow the grim reality of North Korea’s control. The government is known for brutal treatment, and the soldiers may know about the treatment of defectors. Even more important is the economic situation: North Korean soldiers in Ukraine may also be family providers. Their wives and children must figure out how to provide for themselves and the family. In the end, the choice facing these prisoners is not merely a geographic one, but a complex emotional and moral one.
