By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent Emerson College poll reveals that a majority of likely California voters support Proposition 50, Governor Newsom’s redistricting effort, with 57% in favor. This support represents a shift, as certain demographics, including Black voters, have increased their backing of the measure. Proposition 50 would allow the state Legislature to bypass the independent redistricting commission, and the poll indicates it is likely to pass, outside the margin of error. The survey was conducted from October 20-21 with a sample of 900 likely voters and a margin of error of 3.19 percentage points.
Read the original article here
Majority of California voters back Newsom’s redistricting measure: Poll, and it feels like a really significant moment, doesn’t it? The sheer numbers, a resounding 57-37 in favor, scream that this isn’t just a blip on the radar; it’s a forceful statement. It’s almost like a “fuck you” to the tactics the opposing side has been employing. It’s a clear signal that Californians, at least the majority, are ready for a shift.
This enthusiasm is particularly striking because, let’s be honest, California isn’t exactly a political monolith. While it leans blue, there’s a significant contingent of voters who still lean toward the other side. Add to that a segment of the population that might disagree with gerrymandering on principle, and you’ve got a complex landscape. The fact that the measure is still garnering such strong support speaks volumes about the level of solidarity and the underlying sentiment in the state.
I’m glad to see this because it feels like a genuine attempt to address a deeply rooted problem. The issue of gerrymandering has been a thorn in the side of American democracy for far too long. To see a measure with the potential to bring about real change is a welcome development, a positive step toward reclaiming the integrity of the system. It’s a move that recognizes the urgent need to level the playing field. It’s a good step on the road towards getting your country back.
In a state like California, where curriculum includes a lesson on the problems with gerrymandering, it’s not surprising that voters are opposed to it. It’s been really encouraging to see the use of prominent figures, like Obama, endorsing the measure and helping to inform the public. Despite all the effort, many still worry about the Democrats’ performance in the redistricting game. It makes sense, as a temporary measure, it’s a necessary move to protect our democracy.
While it is true that gerrymandering is a problem for both sides, it’s also true that one side has weaponized it in a way that undermines the very foundations of fair representation. In this case, it makes sense to recognize the rules of the game and playing by them to the maximum is the only way to avoid forever losing. The practice is undemocratic, but sometimes you must fight fire with fire.
I’ve even seen the ballot initiative text to get a better understanding of the amendment. The measure will temporarily require new congressional district maps, as passed by the Legislature in August 2025, to be used in California’s congressional elections through 2030. It makes sense to note that there are many states that still engage in this practice. The measure will also direct the California Commission to resume enacting congressional district maps in 2031.
Of course, there are those who argue that such measures are, in essence, taking power away from the people. But it’s worth considering what the House of Representatives is supposed to represent. Instead, it’s often the result of how people in the state have voted for their governors and legislatures to provide representation in the House.
It’s clear that the stakes are high. While this isn’t a perfect solution, it does provide temporary relief. It’s worth noting the voter turnout is high, and this measure requires all of us to be on the same page.