By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former Judge J. Michael Luttig has issued a serious warning, suggesting that Donald Trump’s rhetoric and actions indicate a desire to pursue an unconstitutional third term. Luttig believes Trump has already taken steps during his second term to solidify his power, potentially aiming to remain in office indefinitely. He cited Trump’s actions, such as utilizing the military for personal purposes and seeking to eliminate birthright citizenship, as evidence. Luttig emphasized that the country must take Trump’s intentions seriously and act to preserve the republic.
Read the original article here
Bush-Appointed Judge Predicts Trump Will Cause ‘America’s Ruin’ is the topic at hand, and frankly, the sentiment resonates strongly. It’s almost unsettling to see such a prediction, especially from someone with the judicial background of a Bush-appointed judge. However, it’s not a prediction, is it? More and more, it feels like an observation, a statement on the present state of affairs.
The core issue seems to be the pervasive sense that significant damage has already been inflicted. The consensus appears to be that the ruin is, in many ways, already here. The phrase “too little, too late” keeps popping up. This reflects a feeling that the damage is so extensive that even a swift, decisive change in leadership might not be enough to fully repair the harm. Decades, perhaps, are needed to address the consequences of past actions.
The comments express a deep-seated concern about the erosion of democratic principles. Talk of potential unconstitutional actions, such as a third term in office, creates an atmosphere of unease. There are dark whispers of martial law and the militarization of states, scenarios that would profoundly alter the nation’s fabric. The very idea of compromising the Supreme Court and other branches of government is terrifying.
The focus then shifts from describing what is being done to the people enabling the actions. The blame seems to be widely distributed, with the “enablers” taking center stage. In this case, “enablers” clearly encompasses Trump’s inner circle, Republican politicians who are seemingly unwilling to act against him, and even those who voted for him or, by their absence at the ballot box, allowed him to gain power.
There’s a palpable sense of disillusionment and frustration with the current political landscape. There is no longer a question of if something will happen; it’s a matter of when and how far it will go. It’s difficult to argue with the sentiment that many are in denial about the consequences of specific actions.
The tone grows increasingly bleak, with references to economic instability, trade wars, and a perceived dismantling of social safety nets. The Constitution itself is described as being “stained.” It’s hard to dispute that the current administration’s actions are a direct threat to the very foundations of the country.
The notion that Trump is merely a symptom of a larger problem comes through very strongly. This hints at underlying societal issues that have paved the way for the current political climate, and that must be resolved if the nation has any hope of genuine recovery. The emphasis is on deep-rooted problems that will persist long after a change in leadership.
The question of how to address the situation is posed, and the answers are grim. Removing the President is only part of the solution, if the problem is already here. There’s a growing sense of urgency and perhaps even desperation, as the implications of the situation become more apparent. The need for action is palpable, and the fear is that it may already be too late to avert long-term damage.
Then, the focus shifts to a factual basis, which lists that Trump owes hundreds of thousands of dollars to cities for costs associated with his rallies. This includes expenses for public safety and the increased presence of law enforcement, adding a financial burden. This shows a pattern of the campaign not meeting its financial obligations and leaving local governments to shoulder the cost.
The comments conclude with a general sense of foreboding, a recognition that the situation is grave, and a challenge to those who are still hesitant to confront the reality of the situation. It’s a sentiment of shared anxiety and concern for the future of the nation, a future that many believe is already on a dangerous path. The question remains: can this downward spiral be reversed, or is the ruin already complete?