By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Department of Homeland Security promotional video featuring Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino in a black trench coat has drawn comparisons to Nazi imagery due to the styling of the video. The video, released the same day Bovino was ordered to appear in court, features the commander in a stylized black-and-white portrayal and has led to accusations of fascism and authoritarianism, including from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The video’s release occurred amidst a backdrop of increasing scrutiny of DHS tactics, including those around protests and aggressive deportation goals. The DHS has not responded to questions regarding the video’s production or its potential connection to Nazi symbolism.
Read the original article here
Trump’s Top Border Patrol Goon Roasted for ‘Nazi’ Look: Let’s get right into it, shall we? The immediate reaction to the appearance of this individual, a high-ranking Border Patrol official, is, well, it’s not exactly subtle. The comments make it abundantly clear that many see his chosen look as undeniably reminiscent of Nazi aesthetics. The phrase “If you look like a Nazi, sound like a Nazi and act like a Nazi, you’re probably a Nazi” encapsulates the core sentiment. The details of his appearance and actions, from his haircut to specific hand gestures, are perceived as a conscious choice, a deliberate nod to a deeply problematic historical context.
The criticism goes beyond mere aesthetics. There’s a strong sense that this isn’t just a fashion faux pas, but a deliberate act of provocation. The implication is that this official knew exactly what message he was sending, and that the chosen look was not accidental. The “move out” hand gestures, for example, are seen as further confirmation of the underlying ideology. It’s painted as if he’s simply cosplaying, a performance for the cameras that reveals a darker reality. The use of phrases like “If the Hakenkreuz fits, wear it, I guess” highlight the perception that the visual cues align so precisely with Nazi imagery that it’s difficult to deny the connection.
The comments do not hold back when it comes to expressing disgust. The individual is labelled as a “dork” and a “fascist,” suggesting that this perceived Nazi aesthetic reflects not just his style but also his character and beliefs. Comparisons to figures like Oskar Dirlewanger, a notorious figure in the Nazi regime, highlight the gravity of the accusations. The overall tone is one of incredulity and outrage, a clear indication that many view this as deeply offensive and troubling. Some are calling out the GOP, stating they should stop enabling such individuals. The sentiment appears to be that the official isn’t merely adopting a questionable look; he’s actively embracing a hateful ideology.
The criticisms extend to broader issues, with commentary on the political climate. The focus broadens to include the perceived connection between the official’s appearance and the actions of other figures within the Trump administration. The claim that “ICE are the new brown shirts” reflects a fear that the official’s actions align with a larger pattern of behavior that they associate with fascism. The perception is that Trump is hiring and supporting individuals who align with white nationalist sentiments, contributing to an environment where such ideologies are normalized.
The comments also include a sense of dark humor in their assessment. The use of phrases like “paging Aldo Raines…” and references to fictional characters highlight the absurdity of the situation. Some are pointing out that this official’s actions and appearance are so overt that it’s almost comical. The comments express bewilderment at the apparent lack of self-awareness.
The criticism also touches on the potential consequences of such behavior. The fear is that the official’s actions and appearance are not just offensive, but also a sign of a larger trend toward authoritarianism. The comments point out the potential dangers of individuals like this official holding positions of power, suggesting that they could abuse their authority to further their agenda. The discussion also touches on the importance of voting and resisting any further steps toward what they see as a dangerous direction.
The responses are also filled with historical context, mentioning personal experiences. The mention of a father serving in the US Army during World War II shows the deeply rooted significance the imagery holds for the commenters. Some express concern that people may become accustomed to this “look”. They feel that the normalization of such imagery is a dangerous trend.
There is a sense of inevitability in the responses, as though those in power are setting out to be perceived as Nazis. The official’s actions, his appearance, and the perceived lack of concern from those around him are all viewed as evidence of a deeper problem. The overall impression is one of outrage, alarm, and a deep-seated fear that the values are under threat. It’s a sentiment of watching something happen that they feel they cannot stop.
The comments reveal a fundamental belief. They feel that the official’s actions are indicative of a specific ideology, that his appearance is not a coincidence, and that his behavior is a cause for serious concern. The discussion is a reflection of a wider debate about the direction of the country and the potential rise of extremism. The overall tone is one of frustration, anger, and a desperate plea to wake up to what is happening.