By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene expressed her disgust over the potential doubling of health insurance premiums should tax credits expire, labeling insurance as a “scam.” She criticized the lack of Republican leadership’s discussion or plans to address the issue, emphasizing the financial burden on millions of Americans. Greene’s statement also included her disapproval of foreign aid, particularly to Israel and Ukraine, while highlighting her votes against such allocations. She joined Representative Thomas Massie in criticizing the shutdown as a distraction.
Read the original article here
Pam Bondi’s performance at the Senate hearing, where she faced grilling from a Democrat regarding the Tom Homan $50,000 cash bribe scandal, was nothing short of a masterclass in deflection. Rather than providing clear answers, Bondi opted for a strategy of evasion, stonewalling, and outright refusal to address the core issue: what happened to the money? The very fact that a former top official, the former border czar, was allegedly caught taking a significant cash bribe in a takeout bag and promised to funnel government contracts to cronies, should have triggered immediate alarm bells and a full-scale investigation. Instead, Bondi’s responses, or lack thereof, painted a picture of an administration more concerned with protecting its own than upholding the law and maintaining public trust.
The questions posed to Bondi were straightforward and crucial. Schiff’s persistent inquiries, designed to expose the truth, were met with a combination of non-answers, vague pronouncements, and even personal attacks. The central query, repeatedly dodged, revolved around the fate of the $50,000 in cash. Where did it go? Was it returned? Did Homan pay taxes on it? Bondi’s consistent refusal to provide a direct response, instead relying on pre-prepared statements and deflection, spoke volumes. It raised questions about the integrity of the investigation and the administration’s commitment to holding its own accountable.
The lack of a clear response to basic questions speaks volumes. Did Bondi consult with ethics lawyers regarding Trump’s acceptance of a gift from Qatar? Did Homan keep the money? Did he pay taxes? Did Bondi herself approve the firing of antitrust lawyers who opposed a merger? The questions were pointed, seeking to unveil potential corruption and abuse of power. The fact that Schiff needed to ask the same questions multiple times to obtain any response is an indictment of the administration’s lack of transparency and accountability.
Bondi’s tactics were reminiscent of historical cover-ups, reminiscent of Nixon’s strategy. Her evasiveness and refusal to answer raised serious questions about her own involvement, and the involvement of others, in the alleged corruption. It’s hard to overlook the fact that Bondi herself allegedly took a $25,000 bribe to make a university problem go away while she was the AG in Florida. This history, coupled with her defensive posture, added another layer of concern. It reinforced the perception that the administration was operating a “grift machine,” eroding trust in the very institutions designed to serve the public.
The implication that this administration is not just protecting Homan but obstructing justice is a worrying sign. And it shouldn’t be something that can be excused away due to any political affiliation. The public deserves to know the details of this alleged bribe, and it’s reasonable to assume that the money should have been recovered, and the case investigated properly. The questions about how the administration determined the legality of military strikes and whether prosecutors faced improper pressure are just as concerning. The idea that high-ranking officials can seemingly disregard court orders and operate with impunity is an erosion of trust.
It is important to note that the focus isn’t on the political affiliation of the Senator, but on the serious questions of government accountability. Bondi’s performance highlights the current reality in the government. A troubling trend, where the law is applied selectively, and those in power seem to operate above the law. Bondi’s actions, therefore, were not a sign of failure. They were a calculated strategy designed to avoid accountability and protect those in power. This isn’t about “flailing” or “melting down.” It’s about the systematic dismantling of trust in a system that is designed to be transparent, fair, and just. This is a critical moment for American democracy.