By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent interview, Steve Bannon claimed that Donald Trump will serve a third term in office, despite the constitutional two-term limit. Bannon asserted that there is a plan within Trump’s inner circle to circumvent the 22nd Amendment and keep him in power. This plan, the specifics of which have not been disclosed, is supported by Bannon’s belief that Trump is an “instrument of divine will” and that he is needed for another term. While the Constitution appears clear on this point, Trump himself has previously hinted at such a possibility, though legal experts have widely dismissed any means of subverting the 22nd Amendment.
Read the original article here
Steve Bannon Claims Trump “Will Be the President” for a Third Term — and Inner Circle Has a “Plan”
It appears that Steve Bannon, a prominent figure within Donald Trump’s inner circle, has boldly asserted that Trump will somehow secure a third term as President of the United States. This declaration has, understandably, ignited a flurry of reactions, ranging from disbelief and outrage to grim acknowledgment of potential challenges to the democratic process. Bannon’s words are not just idle speculation; they are coupled with the suggestion that a “plan” is in place to make this unprecedented outcome a reality.
The core of the issue boils down to the fundamental constraints of the U.S. Constitution, which explicitly limits a president to two terms. Any attempt to circumvent this established rule would constitute a direct assault on the principles of democracy and the rule of law. The very notion of a third term, therefore, is inherently a violation of the foundational agreement by which the states operate. Such an action could well be interpreted as treasonous, as some have pointed out, and would undoubtedly lead to a constitutional crisis of epic proportions.
The specifics of this alleged “plan,” however, remain shrouded in secrecy. Many anticipate that it could involve a variety of tactics, from blatant disregard for constitutional norms to more subtle, insidious manipulations of the electoral system. Some speculate that the plan might involve the strategic use of political maneuvers or that it could include the potential for ignoring the results of the 2028 election entirely. The concerns are heightened given the increasingly visible signs of political polarization and the erosion of trust in democratic institutions.
The potential for this to unfold is made all the more dangerous because the current political climate has created the perfect conditions for the plan to succeed. The idea that free and fair elections will remain in place is slowly eroding, some observers believe. Some are worried that the current administration is willing to manipulate the Constitution and other laws to ensure their hold on power, and that this behavior will be met with no real resistance. The idea of a rigged election, the complete militarization of government agencies, and the blatant disregard for norms is cause for great alarm.
The confidence expressed by Bannon and his allies that they can accomplish this is concerning. This confidence may stem from their perception of the American public’s apathy or the Democrats’ inability to stop them, making the opposition to this scheme appear toothless. This perception may be the fuel that drives this movement forward. The fact that the idea is being openly discussed, even if it seems absurd to some, signals a serious threat to the very fabric of American governance.
One likely avenue the “plan” could explore is simply finding ways to ignore the Constitution. It’s been observed that this is already a tactic that has been employed and found to be successful. Another tactic could be simply putting Trump’s name on the ballot, regardless of any challenges. Some have suggested that the plan may involve more drastic measures, such as a national emergency declaration to suspend elections.
Of course, the practicalities of such a plan are immense. Even if the will exists, ensuring Trump’s physical presence and mental capacity to serve a third term would be a significant challenge. However, the apparent belief in his inner circle that it is possible suggests a profound disconnect from the realities of the situation or a willingness to pursue the plan no matter the consequences. And what if Trump fails to survive his second term? Well, even then, this does not eliminate the possibility of the plan to hold power.
Regardless of the specifics, the mere existence of such a “plan,” as articulated by Steve Bannon, is a serious threat. It demands not only vigorous condemnation but also a proactive, coordinated response. The people who value freedom and liberty must be willing to operate outside of typical boundaries, and take action. This includes a united front by all political parties, active citizenry and a readiness to defend the democratic process against any attempt to subvert it. The clock is ticking, and the time for complacency is over.