By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Author Michael Wolff reported that Jeffrey Epstein showed him photos of Donald Trump with topless women during a meeting, around ten years prior. The photos, resembling Polaroids, included images of young women in Trump’s lap, and one with a stain on his pants. When Wolff encouraged Epstein to release the photos after Trump became president, Epstein declined, citing a fear of repercussions. Attorney General Pam Bondi evaded questions about the FBI’s potential discovery of the photos, instead attacking Senator Sheldon Whitehouse for raising the issue.
Read the original article here
I’ve Seen Epstein’s Photos of Trump With Topless Girls: Author
Let’s dive straight into it. The crux of the matter is this: Michael Wolff, an author, claims to have seen photos taken by Jeffrey Epstein of Donald Trump with topless young women. The account is based on a story told on a Thursday episode of *Inside Trump’s Head*. This isn’t just a casual observation; Wolff says he saw these photos firsthand, nearly a decade ago.
Wolff’s description is vivid. He recounts Epstein pulling out a handful of what looked like Polaroids. The specific details are striking: two photos showing young women topless, sitting in Trump’s lap, outside Epstein’s Palm Beach residence, around the swimming pool. A third photo depicted Trump in light-colored pants with a conspicuous stain, with the women laughing and pointing at it. It’s certainly a provocative image, if true.
The implication is clear: Epstein allegedly used these photos, potentially, to exert control. Wolff’s account also suggests Epstein was hesitant to use the photos, even after Trump became President, citing a fear of Trump’s repercussions. This raises the question of how much weight these images might have carried.
The response from the White House, via Steven Cheung, was swift and dismissive, calling Wolff a “lying sack of shit” and accusing him of fabricating stories. The reaction is hardly surprising. Trump’s camp would be expected to vehemently deny such claims.
The timing of this revelation is, as some have pointed out, less than ideal, at least in terms of when Wolff claims he saw them. Why now, after so many years? Some people have criticized Wolff for allegedly keeping the information secret for so long, particularly if he had it before Trump’s election.
There’s a cynicism in this. Many feel that Wolff is using the information for personal gain, to promote his books or gain attention. This is a common criticism leveled at journalists who release potentially explosive information in installments or for maximum impact. It’s a valid point: is this about seeking truth, or about selling a narrative?
The demand for proof is significant. Until the photos are released or corroborated by other evidence, the claims remain just that – claims. Seeing is believing, as the saying goes. The absence of the photos – at least for now – makes it hard to assess the truthfulness of the account.
One can speculate about what could have happened to the evidence. One suggestion is that the evidence was destroyed, possibly to protect Trump. And there are, of course, questions about the validity of the claims given the people involved.
There’s a sense of frustration. People are tired of hearing about potential scandals and damning information without seeing concrete proof. “Release the photos” is a common sentiment.
There are also strong opinions about how this might affect Trump’s supporters. Some think that nothing will change their minds, regardless of the evidence. The core belief is strong, and it’s difficult to shake.
The story highlights how much political dynamics have changed. With accusations, even serious ones, being casually dismissed. Trump, has, in many people’s view, normalized behavior that would have been unthinkable in the past.
Ultimately, the story is a complex one. It’s about allegations of scandalous behavior, the power of photos, the reliability of sources, and the nature of political polarization. The truth will depend on whether further evidence comes to light.