During the Ukrainian counteroffensive in Donetsk Oblast, captured Russian maps revealed a significant discrepancy between the reports provided to Russian command and the actual battlefield situation. President Zelenskyy stated that the Russian maps misrepresented Ukrainian gains, showing opposite positions of control. These distorted reports suggest a disconnect in the Russian military’s internal communication, contrasting with the narrative propagated in Russian media. The president highlighted the deliberate exaggeration of Russian advances, especially regarding the imminent capture of Donbas, and announced Ukrainian control of 330 square kilometers in the Dobropillia and Pokrovsk areas.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy: Seized maps showing the Russians deceiving their own command, it seems, paints a grim picture. It’s a picture of a military, and perhaps even a culture, riddled with deceit. When you start to unravel the layers of this particular onion, the implications are vast, stretching far beyond the battlefield. It’s a systematic breakdown, where truth takes a backseat to self-preservation, and the consequences are dire.
Consider the scenario, a Russian Major or Colonel in the field faces a seemingly impossible order from his General: achieve “X” or face execution. The stakes are as high as they get. So, what happens? He reports victory, even if it’s a fabricated one. This isn’t some isolated incident; it’s a systemic issue. The culture of corruption is so pervasive that it’s almost woven into the fabric of the Russian military, and according to some, even their society at large.
The concept of “Vranyo” is central to understanding this dynamic. Essentially, it’s the communal lie, where everyone knows the truth, but they go along with the fabrication anyway. It’s a shared delusion for personal gain, or maybe, in the face of terrifying consequences, just to survive. This is a system where the fear of retribution stifles honesty, and loyalty to the lie becomes paramount. Think of it as a well-oiled machine of dishonesty, where the cogs are constantly greased with fear and self-interest.
This pattern isn’t new; some would argue that it’s been a characteristic of the Russian system for centuries. It echoes through history, from the old Russian empire to the Soviet era, and now, it seems, to modern-day Russia. The failure of leaders to receive honest information, blinded by ego or fear, has repeatedly proven to be a disastrous recipe. If commanders are either too scared or too self-absorbed to acknowledge the truth, the military suffers, along with any hope for success. The whole system, from the lowest private to the General, is compromised by an intricate web of lies, designed to be perpetuated at all costs.
The implications of this extend beyond battlefield tactics. If the information reaching the top is consistently distorted, the leadership makes decisions based on a false reality. Imagine the reports coming from the front lines: exaggerations and outright fabrications piled upon each other. By the time information reaches the top, the situation could be drastically misrepresented. It’s not hard to imagine that Putin might believe his forces are making significant progress, even when the reality on the ground tells a very different story. He will only know what he is being told, and when lies are constantly being fed up the chain of command, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Furthermore, the system isn’t just about individual dishonesty. It’s a cultural phenomenon. It extends to the lowest levels of the army. The incentives are structured in a way that encourages lying. Soldiers may falsify their achievements to get awards and promotions, and commanders may hide casualties to keep receiving pay for dead soldiers. Everyone profits from the lies, until the reality of combat catches up.
The problem is, in this environment, there’s no space for honest mistakes. It’s a situation where failure isn’t an option. Because of this, a culture of lying has thrived. And in these situations, someone always gets the blame when the lies collapse. The weakest link, the “vatnik” lower on the totem pole, is the scapegoat. This dynamic, this culture of deceit, is not the path to victory.
In short, the seized maps, and the broader context of the Russian military, point to a system where truth has been sacrificed at the altar of self-preservation and corruption. It’s a culture where lying is not just tolerated, but incentivized. Ultimately, it’s the worst possible scenario for a country – a nation of liars who, perhaps, don’t know any other way to function. The implications of this go far beyond battlefield losses; it threatens to undermine the entire war effort.
