By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that Russia is utilizing tankers to launch and control drones in European countries, based on intelligence data. He underscored the importance of sanctions targeting Russia’s energy trade and tanker fleet due to this development. Zelenskyy also urged the closure of the Baltic Sea and other seas to Russian tankers, specifically targeting the “shadow fleet”. This follows recent drone incursions and airport closures across Europe, leading to increased scrutiny of Russian activities.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy: Russia using tankers to launch drones against European countries, it’s a scenario that sounds straight out of a thriller, doesn’t it? The idea that Russia might be deploying drones from seemingly innocent oil tankers, using them as covert launch platforms to target European countries, definitely has a certain James Bond vibe to it, albeit with far more serious consequences than any fictional plot.
The implications are rather alarming, to say the least. If true, this represents a significant escalation in Russia’s tactics, moving beyond conventional warfare and venturing into the realm of asymmetric threats. The use of civilian vessels to conceal military activities adds a layer of deniability and complexity, making it harder to attribute responsibility and potentially raising the risk of miscalculation. It’s like something you’d see in a war game, but with the potential for real-world devastation.
The safety concerns surrounding this are paramount. Oil tankers are inherently dangerous, prone to fires and explosions, even without external threats. Adding the dimension of potential military action, like if European aircraft decided to take action, significantly increases the risk. It’s a volatile combination, and the possibility of a catastrophic incident, either intentional or accidental, is a serious concern. The “shadow fleet,” as it’s been referred to, adds another layer of complexity, as these vessels might not even be officially flagged as Russian, adding another layer of ambiguity.
This has brought about some discussions of potential responses. Some have suggested targeting the tankers, but that raises questions about international law and the potential for escalation. Others are suggesting boarding these vessels. Then there’s the challenge of identifying which ships are involved, since these are often unmarked or falsely flagged. It’s a cat-and-mouse game, and the stakes are incredibly high.
The potential for this is certainly nothing new. There were reports last year of drones appearing near military bases and even nuclear plants, with authorities offering vague explanations. The fact that these drones were described as being of unknown origin and destination is particularly interesting. The implication is that the authorities know more than they are letting on. The possibility that these reports are connected to the tanker drone story, that the tankers themselves were involved in such incidents, is one that demands serious consideration.
The question also arises of what would be done if the drones are launched at critical infrastructure, or other military assets. In the event that the countries know who is doing it. One of the difficulties is the need to maintain public order and avoid a panic, which could result if the countries publicly announced that Roshia is sending drones from tankers. There are also strategic considerations, such as assessing Russia’s response to any counter-measures.
This also raises the issue of how these actions are being taken. The focus has shifted to small drones, which can be remotely operated and easy to launch from a concealed location. Being small and easy to maneuver also make them difficult to detect and track. The suggestion is that the intelligence community already knows where the drones are coming from, which is not surprising, but it does add to the complexity of the situation.
The potential consequences are severe. An attack on any European country could trigger a broader conflict, and the use of these tactics suggests a willingness by Russia to operate in the shadows, pushing the boundaries of acceptable behavior. It’s a disturbing situation, and the response will require a delicate balance of firmness and restraint. The question becomes, how do you respond to a threat that is both hidden and potentially devastating?
Ultimately, this is a complex situation. There are many uncertainties and the information available is incomplete. The potential implications of this are very serious. It is crucial to avoid hasty judgments. In the meantime, the intelligence agencies of affected countries are undoubtedly working to gather all of the evidence and the responses needed.