By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a recent drone attack on Ukraine and Poland, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky engaged in discussions with leaders from Poland, the United Kingdom, Italy, and the NATO Secretary General, emphasizing the need for a unified response to escalating Russian aggression. These discussions focused on the increased number and brazenness of the Russian drones, which entered both Ukrainian and Belarusian airspace, representing a new level of escalation. Zelensky proposed the implementation of a joint air defense system across Europe and increased funding for interceptor drone production. He also offered Poland assistance, including training and expertise, to combat Russian drone activity, and coordinated with Poland on military cooperation.
Read the original article here
Zelensky offers Poland assistance in shooting down Shaheds, a move that, frankly, feels like it should have happened ages ago. We’re talking about a NATO member being offered help by a non-NATO nation in defending its airspace against a persistent threat – those Iranian-made Shahed drones. It highlights the urgency of the situation and the unique expertise Ukraine has gained in the crucible of war. They’re not just defending their own territory, they’re becoming the de facto experts in countering these cheap, mass-produced threats.
The offer itself underscores a critical point: Ukraine’s experience in dealing with Shaheds is unparalleled. They’ve been living on the bleeding edge of drone warfare for years now, constantly adapting and innovating. While NATO members have been shooting down drones, Ukraine has been learning how to do it under fire. They understand the radar signatures of different Shaheds, the best strategies to use in different electronic warfare (EW) situations, and how to make split-second decisions without the luxury of endless meetings. They’re learning by doing, by necessity. This hands-on knowledge is invaluable, and offering it to Poland is a significant gesture of solidarity.
The discussion naturally leads to a call for a joint European air shield. It’s not just about helping Poland; it’s about building a more resilient defense for the entire continent. We are talking about creating a collective defense posture, one that could include things like investing in Iron Dome technology from Israel or maybe even developing their own equivalent. This is about scaling up, sharing resources, and creating an integrated system of defense that can respond quickly and effectively to these kinds of threats. It’s time Europe stops outsourcing its defense and starts taking the initiative.
The comments around the price of air defense are crucial. These Shahed drones are cheap, easily mass-produced, and they can quickly overwhelm traditional air defense systems. It’s a numbers game, and that makes it difficult to effectively counter them. This is where Ukraine’s experience is particularly valuable. They have firsthand knowledge of how to use limited resources against an overwhelming number of threats. They know how to adapt and use the resources available to them.
The point about the air to air missiles is a good one, air to air missiles are expensive, but the Shaheds are cheap. The issue is that the cheap ones, if in enough numbers, can overwhelm the expensive missiles. This has been the new reality, where the war in Ukraine became a drone war.
The idea of a coordinated European response is important. The war in Ukraine has highlighted the weakness in the system. We should consider using the F-35s that the Dutch already have in Poland. The need for a unified front against this threat is stronger than ever.
There is a degree of frustration in the comments. There is an awareness that the response from some quarters has been slow and hampered by political considerations. The urgency of the situation demands a faster, more decisive approach. The comments about “growing a pair” and stopping being such cowards echo this frustration, highlighting the need for a more proactive stance.
It’s also worth noting the undercurrent of the effectiveness of Ukrainian tactics. Attacks on Russian airfields and refineries are mentioned, suggesting a shift in the balance of power. The fact that these attacks haven’t triggered a nuclear response further reinforces the idea that we need to re-evaluate our perceptions.
The potential for strategic strikes on launch sites is discussed. The fact that Shaheds can be launched from a pickup truck complicates things, but the principle remains: We need to target the source.
Ultimately, Zelensky’s offer to Poland is a step in the right direction, but it’s just a beginning. It’s a signal that Europe needs to step up its game, and that Ukraine is ready and willing to share its hard-earned expertise. The key now is for Europe to embrace this offer, and to work together to create a robust and effective air defense system. A joint air shield is not just a good idea, it’s a necessary one.