In a display of global defiance, Xi Jinping orchestrated China’s largest-ever military parade, joined by Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un, marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. Xi emphasized the world’s choice between peace or war, with China standing firmly on the “right side of history.” The event showcased an array of military hardware, including newly developed hypersonic missiles and underwater drones, signaling China’s increasing military capabilities and strategic intent. The gathering of the three autocratic leaders sent a message to the West, highlighting potential new Cold War dynamics, and was seen as a display of solidarity against western-led groups.

Read the original article here

Xi Jinping says world faces ‘peace or war’, and it feels like a declaration that’s both profoundly obvious and deeply unsettling, especially when he’s making this pronouncement alongside Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un during a military parade. Honestly, the whole scene smacks of a “DictatorCon 2025” teaser trailer. It’s hard not to feel a chill down your spine, like we’re being slow-marched toward some kind of global oblivion orchestrated by a handful of, frankly, miserable old men.

Considering the company he’s keeping, Xi’s words ring hollow. “Dialogue over confrontation?” “Against bullying behavior?” It’s a bit rich coming from a guy standing next to a leader actively engaged in a war of conquest, a war that’s been raging for years now. If you’re buddying up with someone who’s invaded a sovereign nation, you’re essentially picking war. And the parade itself, a massive display of military might, seems more like a flexing of muscles than a plea for peace. It certainly leaves a sense that these regimes aren’t exactly eager to put their decisions to a popular vote.

And the guest list! The Iranian president and the Myanmar leader, all present. It’s like a gathering of Bond villains, a real “Dr. Evil’s Lair” kind of vibe. It really doesn’t seem like a group that has the best interests of the entire planet at heart. Honestly, I don’t harbor any personal beef with anyone on the other side of the globe. This feels like a few of those old men are on the brink of a disastrous decision, with no concern of its lasting impact on the rest of the world.

The whole thing is laced with irony. Xi criticizes “bullying behavior” while standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Putin, a man whose actions scream anything but dialogue. The choice, as Xi puts it, is peace or war. But is it really a choice when the “peace” option appears to be a veiled threat of submission? It’s like flipping a coin and being told the outcome is world peace or… well, you get the idea.

The implications are chilling. This isn’t just a geopolitical gathering; it’s a consolidation of power, an open defiance of the established world order. It’s hard not to see this as the rise of a new “axis of evil.” The obvious question becomes: where does this leave us?

It feels like the stage has been set for something truly disastrous. We have China, a growing economic and military powerhouse; Russia, a rogue state determined to rewrite the rules; and North Korea, a nuclear-armed pariah. This is a dangerous combination, and the West’s response to date has been, to put it mildly, inadequate. The money we’ve given Russia and China has been used to finance their aggression.

This whole dynamic is further complicated by the state of affairs in America. A divided nation, weakened by political infighting and a dismantling of the very institutions that made it strong. Is this what we have come to? A world where the future is one of the choices the three of these men have decided? Is this the end game?

The phrase “peace or war” is, ultimately, a meaningless platitude. It’s a statement so incredibly obvious that it lacks all weight and meaning. I mean, what other options are there? The world is either at peace, or it is at war. Churchill, I imagine, would have something pithy to say about the current state of affairs. One thing is certain: If we’re going to navigate this treacherous landscape, we need to do so with eyes wide open, understanding the true stakes of the game.