By John Q. Hosedrinker Due to copyright restrictions, access to the Telegraph Media Group Holdings Ltd content is strictly limited. Unauthorized entry is forbidden. Individuals seeking to view the material must obtain prior permission and hold a valid contract. Interested parties are instructed to contact the licensing team via [email protected] for further details.
Read the original article here
Vietnam builds runway on disputed island to counter China threat.
It seems like the world is once again focused on the South China Sea, and for good reason. Vietnam is reportedly building a runway on a disputed island, a move that’s drawing attention because it’s seen as a direct response to China’s assertive actions in the region. You might be thinking, “Why is this happening?” Well, it’s all part of a complex geopolitical game of claims, counter-claims, and strategic positioning.
The South China Sea, as we all know, is a hotbed of contention, with multiple countries, including Vietnam, China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei, laying claim to various islands and reefs. The resource-rich waters and strategic location make it a prize worth fighting for, or at least building on. The core of the issue is that the competing claims overlap, leading to tensions and sometimes, aggressive actions.
For a long time, the Philippines and Vietnam were actively building on the islands. However, from 2014 to 2016, China ramped up its construction efforts significantly, effectively outmaneuvering the other countries. China’s strategy has involved building artificial islands, essentially creating new landmasses, and then claiming ownership and control over them. This is where the runway comes in, as a way to establish presence and project power. Now, it appears that Vietnam is catching up, with reports indicating they may even surpass China in island-building activities.
Some might see this as a classic case of “tit-for-tat,” with Vietnam adopting the same tactics that China has used to assert its claims. This approach has triggered some reactions of support, applauding the move as a necessary response. Others might argue that it’s a risky strategy, as it could escalate tensions and potentially lead to a confrontation. The potential for conflict and the strategic implications of this decision are significant.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that the island chain is also claimed by Taiwan, and partially claimed by the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei. This means that the runway is not just a confrontation between China and Vietnam, but also involves other actors, each with their own interests and strategic calculations. The Nine Dash Line is the name of the line China uses to mark its claims in the South China Sea.
It’s also worth noting that the international community often has differing perspectives on the South China Sea issue. Some sources question the legitimacy of China’s claims based on historical arguments and the interpretation of international law. The point is that it isn’t a simple case, but a series of conflicts.
The construction of a runway on a disputed island is more than just a physical project; it’s a statement of intent. In the context of the South China Sea, it’s a bold move that sends a clear message about Vietnam’s determination to protect its interests. The runway could give Vietnam greater freedom of action to operate in the area. It could also be seen as a means to counter China’s activities, potentially deterring future aggressive actions.
There are several things to consider. Climate change is a major concern, as rising sea levels could eventually submerge these islands, rendering any infrastructure built on them useless. Additionally, these facilities are vulnerable to the impact of typhoons. The construction of these runways may not survive a major weather event. And unfortunately, Vietnam doesn’t have the naval resources to really defend and protect these sites.
The international community’s response is crucial. Will other countries acknowledge the runway? Will they support Vietnam’s actions or pressure it to de-escalate tensions? These are questions that will shape the future dynamics of the South China Sea. The media plays a significant role in shaping this narrative, and we should always remember to be critical.