By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the events of 9/11, the narrative presented was that extremism was a foreign issue, separate from American values of freedom and democracy. However, the author contends that extremism is a domestic problem, fueled by those in power who wield faith as authority. This type of extremism manifests in wealthy, privileged individuals who shape policy and claim divine sanction for their actions, like invoking scripture to dictate borders and justify violence. Ultimately, the author argues that this fundamentalism, whether Christian nationalism or Zionism, is about power and oppression disguised as divine order, which necessitates a recognition of the domestic sources of this dangerous ideology.
Read the original article here
The US Has a Religious Fundamentalism Problem
It seems pretty clear that the US is grappling with a significant issue when it comes to religious fundamentalism. It’s not a new problem; in fact, you could argue it’s been a defining characteristic of the country since its inception. Think about the initial settlers, the Puritans and other dissenters who sought refuge from religious constraints in Europe. They came here to establish their own communities based on their specific interpretations of faith. This historical context sets the stage for the ongoing challenges we see today.
It’s worth acknowledging the connection between religious fundamentalism and anti-intellectualism. The emphasis on faith over logic, on unquestioning obedience to religious leaders, seems to cultivate an environment where critical thinking struggles to thrive. People are encouraged to believe what they are told, without necessarily questioning or analyzing. This mindset can be easily exploited, as we’ve seen, by political figures and ideologies that seek to control and manipulate.
The echoes of historical trends in the modern day are also worth thinking about. The tendency to demonize those who don’t share the same beliefs, the obsession with cultural purity, the desire to impose religious views on everyone – these are all hallmarks of fundamentalism, regardless of the specific religion. It’s a pattern that can be seen across different faiths, and it’s a pattern that has real-world consequences.
There’s a disturbing parallel that emerges when you examine how religious fundamentalism and politics intersect. The ability to compromise, to find common ground, which is essential for effective governance, becomes nearly impossible. If you believe you are acting under divine authority, then compromise is seen as a betrayal of that authority. This rigidity creates a dangerous environment where dialogue is replaced by dogma, and nuance is lost.
We’ve seen how these kinds of mindsets can lead to the erosion of democratic institutions. The January 6th events are a stark example of where this can lead: a dangerous combination of religious fervor and political extremism. The rise of Christian nationalism, the belief that America should be a Christian nation, is a particularly concerning trend. It directly challenges the principles of separation of church and state, which is a core tenet of American democracy.
The contrast in moral stances is also pretty clear. It’s frustrating to see people using their faith to justify hatred and judgment, especially when it seems so selective. It appears that God always hates the same people they hate. It is also very alarming how these religious people seem to want the entire world to become like them.
It’s important to be very clear: when religious belief crosses the line and begins to dictate how everyone else should live, it morphs into a cult. This extends beyond the individual and can have dire consequences. We see situations where horrific acts are tolerated, even justified, in the name of faith, and the law seems to stand still. This is a chilling reminder of the power that religious extremism can hold over people and their actions.
This problem doesn’t only exist in the United States, either. It’s a global issue, but it is uniquely dangerous in America. The media, politicians, and other organizations are very good at stirring up anger and hate. The constant barrage of misinformation and propaganda that fuels these sentiments makes it difficult to have any real discussions about our differences.
Ultimately, addressing the problem of religious fundamentalism in the US requires a multifaceted approach. It requires fostering critical thinking, promoting tolerance and understanding, and safeguarding the principles of democracy. It means confronting the extremist elements and resisting the temptation to normalize their rhetoric. It means being vigilant and speaking out against those who try to manipulate and control others through their faith.