By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine will soon receive Gripen fighter jets from Sweden, as confirmed by the First Deputy Defense Minister. While details regarding the timeframe and quantity were not disclosed, it was affirmed that the Gripen is included in the list of aircraft Kyiv will be receiving. Discussions regarding the transfer have been ongoing since September 2024, with initial hesitations due to the complexities of managing multiple aircraft systems. The Gripen’s agility and suitability for air combat make it a valuable asset, as evidenced by its recent use in intercepting Russian aircraft over the Baltic Sea.
Read the original article here
Ukraine to Get Gripen Fighters, Deputy Defense Minister Confirms, and this marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict. It’s a significant development, especially considering that this is the first time the Gripen will be rigorously tested in a real-world war scenario. This is something to watch closely, a real test of the plane’s capabilities under the harsh realities of combat. And given that these are coming from EU countries, that adds another layer of strategic importance.
The Gripen is seen as a valuable addition, not just for its presence, but for what it *brings* to the table. While the agility for close-quarters “dogfights” is often mentioned, the real key is something else entirely: dispersal. This plane is built for a fast, flexible response. The ability to land on ordinary roads, then quickly refuel and rearm with a small team in a mobile unit, sets it apart. That rapid turnaround time – about ten minutes – is a huge advantage in a war where time and mobility are crucial.
The Gripen was designed specifically to go up against the Soviet/Russian air force. That was the threat it was built to counter, and now, it’s finally getting the chance. With the Meteor missile, the plane is poised to become a real threat. The Meteor missiles is certainly something that has sparked excitement. It will give them the edge they need. These European weapons provide leverage, freedom of operation.
There is the question of how long it will take to train pilots. While we don’t have a direct comparison of training times, it’s worth keeping in mind that the Gripen was built for practicality. It’s easily maintained and re-armed, and can use highways as runways, which helps in a war where resources are always in short supply.
The MiG-31 is still a threat, particularly with its long-range radar. The Gripen, however, can offset this with AWACS support, essentially using external surveillance to make up for what it lacks in built-in range. This tactic is a key part of the overall strategy, and suggests that these are not just individual aircraft, but part of a larger, integrated system of defense.
The US’s potential control over the process is an issue, though. The Gripen’s American-licensed engine means the US could potentially veto any transfer or sale. This export control regulation raises concerns. However, the EU can and does use its own tactics.
The training and integration process will be key. It will likely be at least a year before we see Ukrainian pilots in the air with Gripens, as they will need to be trained from the ground up. There is a long wait, and is important. The sensor and avionics package is another important aspect. The exact details are unknown, but the effectiveness of the Gripen will depend on what it is equipped with.
The fighter’s performance record, however, is not a direct indicator of its capabilities. It has been used by Thailand against Cambodia, but drawing conclusions based on such engagements is not entirely conclusive. Its success is contingent on the specific conflict scenario and the threats the Gripen will face.
The core of the Gripen’s design is “be so expensive and annoying to invade that it simply isn’t worth it.” This defensive approach is being tested. It remains to be seen if the Gripen’s strengths will live up to the demands of this conflict. It does bring a versatility to the fight, the ability to engage with drones, perhaps even using the gun for that purpose. While the primary use for fighters is currently not close combat. The Gripen’s ability to fire missiles at a distance is a great strength.
It’s also important to note that this plan was most likely in the works long before now, perhaps even before the wider allies got involved. The Gripen is something between the Rafale and the Mirage, closer to the Rafale, and that is great news for Ukraine.