By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian forces struck two oil refineries in Russia overnight on September 20th, one in Saratov and another in Samara Oblast, as confirmed by Ukraine’s General Staff. The strikes also damaged a key transport infrastructure facility in Samara. These actions are part of Kyiv’s ongoing campaign to diminish Russia’s military-economic potential, targeting oil and gas infrastructure vital for supporting the Russian armed forces. The reported attacks occurred amid a backdrop of gasoline shortages in Russia, further intensifying the impact of the Ukrainian strikes.
Read the original article here
Ukraine strikes oil refineries in Russia’s Saratov and Samara oblasts, military confirms, and it seems like a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict. It’s a strategic move, a calculated economic pincer maneuver, as it were, designed to disrupt Russia’s oil supply chains both internally and externally. The aim is clear: to choke off Russia’s vital oil revenue, which acts as the lifeblood of its war effort.
It’s noteworthy that these strikes are only possible now, after Ukraine has developed its own long-range strike capabilities. This represents a crucial shift in the dynamics of the war, allowing Ukraine to finally inflict consistent pain on Russia’s oil and gas infrastructure. These targets are not just a stone’s throw away; they’re located beyond 500 kilometers from the border, emphasizing the reach and sophistication of Ukraine’s new capabilities.
The strategy appears to be a smart one, almost like Ukraine has outmaneuvered its opponent. It’s a tactic that has the potential to drastically alter future conflicts. Considering the current situation, it highlights the idea that even in an uneven power dynamic, the ability to strike at your adversary’s infrastructure, especially with the help of drones and long-range missiles, can neutralize a bully. It is a new era, where drones almost take the place of nukes.
The anticipated decrease in oil flow is another crucial aspect of this strategy. It also touches upon the core concept that striking refineries has a larger impact than merely targeting oil fields. Refineries are the bottleneck. Hitting them, where gasoline and other products are made, creates more significant and longer-lasting damage. Refineries are more complex, with specialized equipment that’s hard to replace, especially considering the sanctions on materials that go into it.
This is also potentially the start of a major public relations problem for Russia. With gasoline shortages and rising prices affecting everyday life for millions of Russians who own cars, the war becomes something more tangible, something that directly impacts their daily routine. This kind of disruption, when it affects the average person, can breed internal political instability and dissatisfaction, potentially causing the government a headache.
There’s the potential for Russia to have to import refined oil products while simultaneously exporting crude oil, which earns them less revenue. It’s a recipe for economic hardship, especially when combined with the other goals like reducing Russia’s export revenues. The disruption of oil and gas infrastructure may even lead to a difficult winter for the Russian population.
This shift in focus from oil fields to refineries makes strategic sense. Refineries have high-tech, costly equipment that can’t be easily or quickly replaced. They process the crude oil from numerous oil fields, essentially causing a ripple effect of damage. By targeting these “shiny special things,” as one comment puts it, Ukraine inflicts more critical damage with fewer munitions.