By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the death of a Georgia police officer, gunned down by a shooter motivated by COVID vaccine disinformation, former President Trump has not publicly acknowledged the officer’s death. Contrastingly, Trump is providing extensive honors for a deceased political ally, reflecting a pattern of prioritizing support for his supporters over expressions of sympathy for those perceived as political adversaries. Throughout his career, Trump has often encouraged and even condoned political violence, and has also failed to offer condolences or condemn violence against those who oppose him. This pattern extends to remarks made during his rallies and in public statements throughout the years.
Read the original article here
Trump Keeps Blaming ‘The Left’ For Political Violence – After Stoking It For Years
It’s impossible to ignore the blatant hypocrisy and dangerous game being played by certain political figures, particularly Donald Trump, when it comes to political violence. The pattern is clear: Trump consistently blames “the Left” for inciting unrest, while simultaneously engaging in behavior that has, for years, actively encouraged and even celebrated violence from his own supporters. It’s a tactic as old as time, yet it continues to be employed, and alarmingly, it seems to resonate with a segment of the population.
One of the most striking aspects of this behavior is the stark contrast in Trump’s responses to acts of violence depending on the perceived political affiliation of the victims and perpetrators. When a law enforcement officer, seemingly motivated by vaccine disinformation, was killed, Trump offered no public condolences, didn’t lower flags to half-staff, and didn’t even acknowledge the death. However, when right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk was targeted in an attack, Trump immediately offered a state funeral, praising Kirk’s values, while blaming his political opponents. This double standard is not only insensitive but also sends a clear message about who Trump considers worthy of sympathy and validation. It speaks volumes about the kind of environment he is comfortable fostering.
Trump’s long history of inciting violence is well-documented. From his early days on the campaign trail, he has encouraged his supporters to assault protestors, promising to pay their legal fees. He has told police officers that it’s okay if they injure suspects during arrests. He even expressed a desire to use military force against protesters. These are not just off-the-cuff remarks; they are deliberate actions that have real-world consequences. They create a climate where violence against those perceived as opponents is not only tolerated but, in some cases, even celebrated.
The consequences of this rhetoric are evident in the increasing instances of politically motivated violence. Many of the most prominent acts of political violence, including the January 6th insurrection and other attacks on Democratic figures, have been carried out by individuals who identify as Trump supporters. This is not a coincidence. It is a direct result of the constant barrage of inflammatory rhetoric that demonizes political opponents and encourages a sense of righteous anger among his followers. The former President has often used his platform to amplify conspiracy theories and spread disinformation, further exacerbating the divisions within the country.
The strategy of blaming “the Left” is a classic example of projection and deflection. By accusing his opponents of inciting violence, Trump attempts to shift the blame away from himself and his supporters. It’s an attempt to rewrite history and create a false narrative that absolves him of any responsibility for the consequences of his words and actions. Furthermore, it is a desperate attempt to unite his base by providing a common enemy, further polarizing the country.
This isn’t about defending the “Left” or downplaying any genuine concerns about political violence. It’s about recognizing the undeniable reality that Trump has consistently used inflammatory rhetoric to sow division and encourage violence, then cynically turning around and blaming his opponents for the chaos he helped create. The truth is staring us in the face, and it’s time to call out this dangerous game for what it is: a deliberate attempt to erode the foundations of democracy and maintain power through fear and division. This is not about political differences; it’s about recognizing a pattern of behavior that is fundamentally harmful to our society.