By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration is escalating its offensive against drug trafficking in the southern Caribbean, warning that traffickers will face consequences, as evidenced by the destruction of a boat allegedly carrying drugs. This action, viewed as a move against Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, has raised questions about the U.S.’s ultimate goal in the region, and whether that goal is regime change. The U.S. aims to exert pressure on Maduro, hoping to incite internal conflict and potentially force his removal, possibly utilizing increased military presence and the targeting of cartels as a means to this end. The administration has already deployed additional military assets and designated cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, granting them the legal authority to take further action, as stated by key figures in the White House.
Read the original article here
“Venezuela has been a very bad actor,” Trump says, threatening escalation… and honestly, it’s hard not to see this as a potential play right out of a well-worn playbook. The phrase itself, “a very bad actor,” feels loaded, doesn’t it? Especially coming from a figure who has, let’s face it, been described by many as a “bad actor” himself. It’s a bit rich, isn’t it? This whole situation just screams of potential distractions. You know, the classic move to divert attention from things that are bubbling under the surface, things that perhaps he doesn’t want people to be thinking about.
The timing, it feels… convenient. And the mention of escalating the situation in Venezuela? That’s what’s sparking alarm bells. War, or even the threat of it, can be a powerful tool to control the narrative. It’s a tried-and-true method to get people to rally around a flag, to quiet dissent, and to change the news cycle. Considering what’s potentially hanging over his head with, say, the Epstein files, it’s not a stretch to consider that a crisis in Venezuela could be very beneficial.
Let’s not forget the context here. We’re talking about a country with the largest oil reserves on earth. That’s a significant resource, something that undoubtedly interests many players on the global stage. And while the specifics of any potential conflict are still vague, it’s hard to ignore the possible economic implications. The way things are set up right now, it feels like a game of chess being played for high stakes, with a whole lot more than just oil on the table.
Then there’s the argument that he’s tough until it comes to his friends. It begs the question, who are the “big boys” he avoids confronting? Is this about power plays, or is it about something else? Maybe the threat to Venezuela is merely about shifting focus, a theatrical performance rather than genuine action. A classic move to take the attention away from the big stuff and get people to argue over something else entirely.
He has the history of using international issues to distract from domestic troubles. And with all that is coming out of the woodwork, from the Epstein files to the handling of Russia, it wouldn’t be surprising if this all fits into a bigger plan. It’s a classic case of projection, really. Pointing fingers at Venezuela while overlooking the role of the US in destabilizing the region for its own benefit.
The fact that he allegedly stopped attacking Canada and Greenland tells you all you need to know. He only punches down. And if you don’t fight back, he’ll go forward. But he’s a coward, and weak as fuck. Scared shitless all the time, constantly bitching and complaining. Remember, in his own words, there’s no such thing as bad press, if they are talking about you, then you are controlling them. A crisis in Venezuela would get everyone talking about him, and distract from what needs to be talked about. The timing is just too perfect for it to be a coincidence.
Also, let’s face it, starting a war would be an incredibly convenient way to halt, postpone, or straight-up derail the midterms. And considering how things are going politically, that’s just another reason to be wary. It’s a cynical thought, I know, but the possibility exists and should be considered. This is the same man who reportedly considered starting a war with Iran before the 2020 elections. It would be a complete betrayal, and it’s not a position the country should find itself in.
The potential war feels like the ultimate distraction. To what end? To protect a man who may be the worst “bad-faith actor” in the history of the planet? To enable a man whose entire campaign was based off of lies? Is this the road we want to go down? And who will pay the ultimate price? The answer, as always, is it will be the people who suffer. This is about more than national security. It is about the preservation of an image at the expense of everything else. It’s the most important thing.