By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former President Donald Trump stated that NATO member countries should shoot down Russian aircraft if they enter their airspace, a stance more aggressive than current NATO leaders. The comments followed multiple incursions of Russian aircraft into the airspace of NATO countries, sparking debate within the alliance. While European leaders have expressed outrage and vowed to respond, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte suggested a more cautious approach, advocating for analysis of intent before taking action. These varying viewpoints highlight the ongoing challenges in deterring Russian aggression and maintaining the alliance’s preparedness.
Read the original article here
Trump says NATO countries should shoot down Russian aircraft that violate their airspace. Well, isn’t that something? It’s a pretty straightforward stance, and frankly, it’s hard to disagree on the surface. If a Russian aircraft, be it a plane or a drone, is blatantly violating the airspace of a NATO country, the response seems simple: take it down. It’s a matter of national sovereignty, a clear signal of defense, and a deterrent to further incursions.
Then again, with Trump, it’s never quite that simple. It’s easy to imagine the scenario where he gives this simple “Yes”. However, It’s also easy to see him backpedaling faster than you can say “fake news” the next day. He’s got a history of flip-flopping, of saying one thing and then doing the opposite, or at least hedging his bets until he knows which way the political winds are blowing. What he says in the moment is what someone told him, and he doesn’t put much thought into his words, so will he remember? Will he be there to help?
The worry is always about consistency, particularly when dealing with a figure who seems to thrive on chaos. Would he actually back up a NATO country if they shot down a Russian plane? Would the US, under his leadership, invoke Article 5, the cornerstone of the NATO alliance, which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all? Or would he find a way to fault the NATO country, to blame the victim, perhaps by repeating what Putin is saying?
The big question remains whether he would back the rest of NATO in such a circumstance. That’s the problem. He might be saying the right thing today, but what happens tomorrow? That’s what matters. His rhetoric might be strong, but would his actions follow suit? Or, worse, would he actively undermine the alliance, weakening it in a time of crisis?
The implications of such a move are terrifying. To see NATO crumble under pressure would open the floodgates for further Russian aggression and destabilization. It’s gambling with World War III, it is.
It’s also crucial to note that Trump says everything and its opposite. Maybe he is looking for World War III. What if he doesn’t actually mean it? Maybe this is just some political gambit, a way to stir things up, make headlines, and feed his ego. Or perhaps he’s been influenced by those around him, echoing what he thinks people want to hear, or what he was told. It’s difficult to tell what’s genuine and what’s calculated.
This is where things get even more convoluted. It wouldn’t be surprising if, the very next day, he starts denying he ever said such a thing, claiming it was “fake news”. Or he’ll launch into a rambling tangent about some other country’s aircraft, deflecting and obfuscating. This is Trump, after all.
And what’s really concerning is the potential for manipulation. Russia could easily use a situation like this to their advantage, testing the resolve of NATO, and probing for weaknesses. They might even be hoping for a situation where a plane is shot down, giving them a pretext for escalation, a chance to fuel the narrative of being at war with NATO. It’s a dangerous game, and one that requires cool heads and unwavering resolve.
At the end of the day, the important thing is to recognize that, when it comes to Trump, there is always the question of “what if?”. What if he reverses course? What if he blames the victim? What if he undermines the alliance? These are the questions that keep us up at night. Because ultimately, the words are just words. It’s the actions that matter.