By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the arrest of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk, President Trump released a video response. In the video, Trump attributed blame for Kirk’s murder to his political opponents and the media, rather than denouncing violence from all sides. Trump threatened to use the force of government against those he deems responsible for the killing, including organizations and individuals. Despite the lack of information about the suspect’s motives, Trump has already indicated that he will exploit the tragedy to target dissent and stoke further division.
Read the original article here
Trump chose wrath over unity following Charlie Kirk’s killing. The immediate reaction to the tragic death of Charlie Kirk highlighted a pattern of behavior from Donald Trump, one where division and the exploitation of tragedy took precedence over any attempt at national unity or even basic human empathy. Instead of offering condolences or calling for calm, the focus immediately shifted to assigning blame, stirring up resentment, and capitalizing on the situation for political gain.
This decision, or perhaps the lack thereof, to embrace rage rather than offer solace, revealed a deeper strategy: Trump saw an opportunity to energize his base, demonize his opponents, and potentially consolidate power. The focus was on amplifying existing divisions, painting the “other” as the enemy, and stoking the flames of fear and anger. This is a recurring theme throughout his political career. The comments consistently reflect how Trump’s actions have consistently prioritized personal gain and the satisfaction of his own ego over any sense of common good or the well-being of the nation.
The act seemed to be a calculated move, a carefully crafted performance designed to distract from his own vulnerabilities and deflect scrutiny from potential scandals. The Epstein files, the failing economy, and alleged collaboration with Russia all seemed to be eclipsed by the narrative that was constructed around Kirk’s death. This diversionary tactic, sadly, is a well-worn one, as Trump repeatedly uses any crisis to his advantage, using the situation as a springboard to attack his perceived enemies and strengthen his grip on power.
The narrative was quickly established, often even before the facts of the case were fully known. Conspiracy theories started circulating, with little regard for the truth. This manipulation of information serves a critical purpose: to control the narrative, create a climate of suspicion, and further polarize the country. The goal is to ensure that his followers view any opposition as a threat.
It’s evident that Trump actively chose to prioritize his own agenda over any form of unity. This involves turning a deaf ear to calls for compassion and restraint. His words and actions consistently fuel division, amplify the worst instincts of his supporters, and undermine any hope for a more civil and united nation. This pattern is a constant reminder of how Trump thrives on chaos, and how he uses it to his advantage.
The response, or lack thereof, isn’t a deviation from his character; it’s a confirmation of it. He is an individual who doesn’t possess the capacity to lead with empathy or to prioritize the common good. It’s important to remember that leadership, especially in times of crisis, should model the best aspects of the population and guide them toward a unified effort to address the situation. Trump’s response, however, was the polar opposite.
The response, therefore, was not a misstep but a deliberate choice. It was a choice to prioritize his own political ambitions, to exploit a tragedy for personal gain, and to further divide a nation that desperately needs healing. This underscores the urgent need for Americans to recognize this pattern and to refuse to be manipulated by fear, anger, and division. We must, instead, choose unity, compassion, and a commitment to building a better future.