By John Q. Hosedrinker A recent report in the *New York Times* detailed a failed 2019 SEAL Team 6 operation in North Korea, aimed at planting a listening device to intercept communications from Kim Jong Un. President Trump, when questioned about the mission, stated he had no prior knowledge of it. The mission, involving the same unit that killed Osama bin Laden, reportedly failed when the team was spotted and retreated without completing their objective. The Pentagon and White House typically do not comment on SEAL Team 6 operations.
Read the original article here
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission, and the predictable response is… well, it’s a multifaceted thing, isn’t it? The immediate reaction is that it’s a situation ripe with potential pitfalls, no matter what side you’re on. The underlying assumption is that any admission of a botched special forces operation, especially one involving a nation like North Korea, would be immediately problematic.
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission and the possible response options are pretty limited, and none of them offer an easy out. He could deny it outright, which, given his history, wouldn’t be surprising. He could claim ignorance, a tactic he’s employed frequently. Or he could try some variation of “it wasn’t my fault,” possibly blaming someone else, like Obama or Biden. There’s also the option of trying to justify the action, even if it failed miserably. The options are limited, each with its own set of risks and implications.
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission and the likely outcome is that he would probably deny any knowledge. This is a move that plays into the well-established narrative that he doesn’t take responsibility for anything. This approach also allows him to sidestep any questions about the details of the mission, its planning, or its execution. It is a way to avoid admitting to a failure that could reflect poorly on his leadership.
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission, and the reality is that it is a no-win situation. Any public acknowledgment of a failed operation, even if partially true, could have severe ramifications. The details of the mission are almost certainly classified for a multitude of reasons, so openly discussing it would be a breach of security. It could also potentially trigger a hostile reaction from North Korea, leading to further instability and conflict.
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission and the inevitable fallout is that it would be a major political and media event. Given the high stakes involved and Trump’s history of making controversial statements, his response will be scrutinized. The reactions would vary across the political spectrum, with detractors likely to highlight the perceived incompetence and recklessness, while supporters would attempt to defend him or deflect the blame. The focus of the media would likely shift away from the actual incident towards Trump’s response.
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission and the reactions, across the board, would be polarized. Whether it is “I had no idea,” or some other variation, it’s pretty much guaranteed that his response will be met with derision. In the current political climate, it would be considered par for the course. Any admission of wrongdoing is unlikely, so the response will, in all likelihood, be a flat denial, or some form of deflection.
Trump responds to report on failed SEAL Team 6 North Korea mission and the core of the matter is that there is no “right” answer. As a rule, no President is going to openly admit to a failed mission. He might deny it ever happened. He might try to brush it off. However, the bottom line is that the political climate ensures that whatever response is given will be attacked, and it will be impossible to come out on top.