By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Social Security Administration (SSA) Commissioner Frank Bisignano has not ruled out raising the retirement age to address the program’s projected insolvency by 2034. Bisignano stated that “everything is being considered” when asked about this possibility, suggesting other options like increasing the maximum taxable earnings subject to Social Security tax are also under review. The Social Security Trustees estimate that the program’s funding gap could be addressed by permanently raising payroll taxes by 3.65 percentage points. The current full retirement age has been steadily rising since 1983.
Read the original article here
Social Security Retirement Age Could Rise Under Trump is a significant concern, particularly given the financial state of the program. The current “full” retirement age in the US is already 67, meaning many Americans need to work until then to receive their full benefits. The prospect of this age being raised further is understandably unsettling. The projections from the Social Security Trustees indicate that the program’s trust funds are heading towards insolvency by 2034. This situation could lead to automatic benefit cuts of around 21% if Congress doesn’t intervene with legislative action. The potential impact of these cuts is immediate, affecting anyone planning to be alive in the next nine years.
One of the main drivers of this potential change seems to be the desire to avoid increasing taxes on the wealthy. A common sentiment is that the focus should be on raising taxes for the rich and including capital gains in taxable income. This would potentially stabilize Social Security without forcing ordinary Americans to work longer. The frustration is palpable among many who feel that those with the most financial resources are not contributing their fair share, leaving the burden on those less fortunate to bear the brunt of program shortfalls.
The core issue, as perceived by many, is a lack of foresight in light of the increasing productivity that automation brings. The argument is that instead of raising the retirement age, the focus should be on lowering it, allowing people to enjoy a higher quality of life and benefit from technological advances. The prospect of having to work until the very end, while others seem to enjoy comfortable retirements, is a source of deep dissatisfaction. A common thread is the feeling of being left behind by a system designed to favor the wealthy. The sentiment expressed is that Social Security is being undermined by those who are already rich, and the working class is left to suffer.
The Republican party’s stance on Social Security, historically, has often been viewed with suspicion by some. The claim is that Republicans, in general, are looking to defund Social Security entirely. This suspicion is compounded by concerns about the former president’s actions and statements. Raising the retirement age is seen as a step in this direction. The concerns are valid considering that many people, especially those in their 60s, are looking to retire in the near future.
The implications of these potential changes also extend to the broader economic and social fabric of the country. If people are forced to work longer, there’s less time for leisure, family, and civic engagement. The economy could be affected as well, potentially leading to reduced spending and fewer opportunities for younger generations. The general feeling is of an erosion of the American dream, a sense that the promise of a comfortable retirement is slipping away. The fact that the former president, Donald Trump, has already indicated a desire to change Social Security is particularly worrying to many.
Furthermore, some believe that despite the billions brought in from tariffs, the former president may not use these funds to strengthen Social Security. The concern stems from the fact that Trump has repeatedly broken promises and has already signaled his intention to alter Social Security. The potential increase in the retirement age is also seen as a betrayal of those who have faithfully paid into the system.
The arguments go as far as the suggestion that the extremely wealthy should contribute more to secure the futures of the less fortunate. The suggestion is that higher taxes on the rich would help preserve the solvency of Social Security. The emphasis is on creating a safety net that will also secure future generations. It should be noted that the Republicans’ 2024 platform states that there would be no changes to the retirement age.
Ultimately, the potential increase in the Social Security retirement age is a complex issue with far-reaching consequences. It involves financial concerns, political ideologies, and the well-being of millions of Americans. The future of Social Security and the ability of Americans to retire comfortably hang in the balance.