By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the controversial comments, Nexstar, a major ABC station owner, swiftly canceled *Jimmy Kimmel Live!* mirroring a similar situation with *Stephen Colbert* at Paramount due to pending FCC approval for a significant acquisition. Despite public disapproval, Carr suggested *The View* might be targeted next, raising concerns about whether it qualifies as a “bona fide news show” and thus should be subject to the “equal time” broadcast rule. Carr’s suggestion implies scrutiny by the FCC. The decision of Carr shows the influence and effect that the former president has over the media.
Read the original article here
Trump Already Has His Next Target After Jimmy Kimmel Suspension, it seems, is practically a foregone conclusion. The whole situation underscores a pattern we’ve seen before: a relentless pursuit of perceived enemies. It’s almost predictable at this point. One target is neutralized, and immediately, the search begins for the next one. It’s like a political game of whack-a-mole, except the moles are people and the mallet is… well, you get the idea.
The swiftness with which “The View” was identified as the next potential target following Jimmy Kimmel’s situation is hardly surprising. After all, “The View” is a highly-viewed ABC show, and, crucially, it features a panel of outspoken women, a group that seems consistently in his crosshairs. It’s not just about the show itself; it’s about the perceived threat to his authority, the challenge to his narrative, and the platform afforded to voices he dislikes. This is not simply a political disagreement, it’s a targeted attack.
The question of whether “The View” is a “bona fide news show” is a red herring, a distraction tactic. The Fairness Doctrine, repealed decades ago, has nothing to do with this. The core issue is not about the rules of broadcasting; it’s about controlling the message. It’s about silencing dissent and diminishing voices that counter his own. The ultimate goal, it would seem, is to limit exposure to anything critical of him and his agenda.
The implications are broad. Some find “The View” “toxic” and absurd, and personally dislike the show. But the core issue here is not whether you agree with the hosts of “The View”. It’s about supporting their right to exist and share their voices, even if you disagree with them. It’s about the principle of free speech and the dangers of political censorship. What is the next show or personality going to be? This constant targeting creates a chilling effect.
The predictable pattern of attack doesn’t stop with “The View”. The pattern continues. The political theater could continue to target any show or personality that dares to criticize or challenge. The next round of targets will only continue to grow. As the “First, They Came” poem suggests, silence dissenting voices one by one until there is no one left to speak.
One might even suggest that the focus should be on the source. Contacting local broadcast hosts, cable/streaming providers, and national syndicates to show interest in the content is one way to counter these types of censorship. And, as someone else mentioned, follow, save, share and repost these media outlets and content on their socials.
It is worth noting, some of those who support the First Amendment should consider how these types of actions can cause future harm. If Trump were re-elected, or perhaps in the future, similar tactics could be used to silence any dissenting voice.
The issue cuts across political lines. Many people on the left and the right are ready to storm the capitol if this show is silenced. Ultimately, this goes beyond personal feelings about a show. It’s about the kind of society we want to live in, one where dissent is tolerated, even encouraged, or one where criticism is met with threats and intimidation.